Eurasian Yearbook 2025
Eurasian Yearbook 2025
The third issue of the periodical publication "Eurasian Yearbook" of the Scientific Council of the Division of Historical and Philological Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences on complex problems of modern history and culture of Eurasia continues the study of key processes across Greater Eurasia. The central focus of this issue is on issues of historical and contemporary integration and disintegration, examined through the prism of the Eurasian idea in Chinese interpretation, historical rivalry over Pacific markets, and post-Soviet settlement between Russia and Ukraine.
A significant portion of the publication is devoted to a comprehensive study of Eurasia's subregions from ancient times to the present day. Topics raised include ethnogenesis, statehood, energy cooperation, educational policy, and the "green" economy. Separate sections address issues of historical memory and politics, including the perception of World War II in Iran, the image of NATO in Cold War media, and the repatriation of the population from Southern Sakhalin, as well as the linguistic and literary heritage of the Eurasian space.
For researchers, educators, university students, and anyone interested in the issues of modern history and culture of Eurasia.
June 20, 2025
Received
July 05, 2025
Approved after reviewing
December 04, 2025
Published
April 21, 2025
Received
June 01, 2025
Approved after reviewing
December 04, 2025
Published
Processes of integration and disintegration in the space of Greater Eurasia
Part I
Maslov A.A.
Abstract
The Russian-American Company (RAC) and the British Hudson’s Bay Company (HBC) paid much attention to Alaska and the Aleutian Islands at the beginning of the 19th century. The article studies the interaction of England and Russia in the North Pacific Ocean. Mutual information about the HBC and the RAC appeared long before the first official contacts. The RAC managed to establish direct contact with the headquarters of the British company in London. It is noted that the presence of the British in the colonial waters of Russian America caused concern even in political circles of St. Petersburg. Therefore, the proposal of British subjects to jointly fight against fur traders from Boston found a very cool response from the headquarters of the RAC and the ministries supervising the company. The main rulers of the RAC used the contradictions between the indigenous people of Alaska and the British to strengthen the influence in the coastal territory. In 1854, the Russian and British governments recognized the neutrality, which guaranteed the safety of the companies’ property. The article uses documents from domestic and foreign archives.
Hudson’s Bay Company, Russian-American Company, colonies, Alaska, 18th-19th centuries
Keywords
Abstract
Conceptions of classical and neo-Eurasianism, and related notions such as a “common Eurasian space” or “Greater Eurasia,” are viewed by Chinese academics and policymakers as largely abstract and cultural, contrasting with the historical exclusion of China from Eurasia in Chinese perspectives. Within the context of China, Eurasianism is primarily a theoretical construct developed by Russian political theorists, which has garnered some measure of support from contemporary political figures. Throughout history, China has perceived threats from Eurasian entities; initially nomadic groups, and subsequently Western imperial powers. The existence of trade and political links, both historically and presently, has not been precluded by this, however, it does not facilitate a common understanding of the cultural and spatial continuum. The 20th and 21st centuries saw Asian countries pursue an inclusive identity through ideas like Pan-Asianism and common Asian values, however, national and regional concepts, like the “Chinese Dream” and “Belt and Road Initiative,” have become dominant. China doesn’t view the Eurasian cultural-spatial concept as inclusive; thus, grasping its cultural and historical significance globally necessitates finding fresh avenues for robust intellectual collaboration between Russia and China.
Russia, China, Asia, Eurasianism, search for identity, cultural values, pan-Asianism, Belt and Road, Chinese Dream
Keywords
Petrov A.Yu.
Sub-regions of Eurasia (from ancient imes to the present day)
Part II
Prudnikov A.D.
Abstract
This article examines the issue of dividing Soviet assets and debts among the former Soviet republics. The author focuses on the negotiations regarding these matters between two key CIS states ‒ Russia and Ukraine. It is shown that, despite the agreements reached in the early 1990s on the so-called “zero option,” under which Russia, in exchange for fully repaying all Soviet debts, received all Soviet overseas property, Ukraine subsequently laid claim to a portion of Soviet assets. According to the author, Ukraine has no legal basis for such claims, since, as of the early 2020s, Russia has paid off all Soviet debts to foreign creditors and therefore has the right to claim the entirety of Soviet assets, regardless of Kyiv’s ratification of the 1994 Russian-Ukrainian agreement.
post-Soviet space, collapse of the USSR, Russia, Ukraine, USSR debts, Soviet assets, division of Soviet property, zero option, negotiations, ratification, Euromaidan, coup d’etat, special military operation, Ukrainian crisis
Keywords
July 07, 2025
Received
July 30, 2025
Approved after reviewing
December 04, 2025
Published
Bazarov B.V., Gombozapov A.D.
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of ethnopolitical processes in Mongolian society in the late Middle Ages. The post-imperial period is characterized by significant transformations of the political and ethnic landscape associated with the processes of re-emigration of Mongolian military contingents and service population. The most important characteristic of this is the transformation from the system of military-administrative units of the Yuan Empire into an ethnopolitical community. Collected and replenished from different clan and tribal units to perform certain security, military, economic, administrative and other tasks and being resettled after certain events to the Mongolian steppes, the collectives of service people gradually lost the original purpose of their organization and replaced it in the conditions of economic particularism with an ethnic and cultural identity with a characteristic set of functions. However, this set cannot be reduced to a narrow "repertoire", an expression of only socio-cultural differences. Social groups clothed in ethnic form were simultaneously tribal, territorial and political associations
Mongolia, identity, ethnic community, tribal, tumen
Keywords
Published
December 04, 2025
Approved after reviewing
July 05, 2025
Received
June 01, 2025
Golikova S.V.
Abstract
The article examines the establishment of the Moscow-Siberian Route within the Perm Governorate, a process that continued until the 1820s. The road is analyzed as a transport infrastructure object, focusing on the selection of its route, engineering solutions, and equipment. By 1754, the route took its familiar form as a postal road from Moscow through Nizhny Novgorod and Kazan to Kungur and Yekaterinburg, and then to Tyumen. Significant changes in the route occurred after the establishment of the Perm Viceroyalty (later Governorate), when it turned through the district town of Okhansk to Perm and then back to Kungur. Two other minor adjustments near Okhansk and the border with Tobolsk Governorate were made due to challenging hydrological conditions in the basins of the Kama and Pyshma rivers. The route passed through five cities and Okhansky, Permsky, Kungursky, Krasnoufimsky, Yekaterinburgsky, Kamyshlovsky districts (uyezdy) (from the station “Kosulino” began its more southern branch through the city of Shadrinsk), with improvements including an increase in postal stations (from 22 to 31/32) and standardization of distances between them (to the norm of 25 km). The challenges of constructing the route ‒ its length of 706 km within the governorate and the difficult terrain (the deep Kama River, the Ural Mountains crossing)—were mitigated by the efforts of K.F. Moderah, the governor of Perm. As one of the best engineers of his time, he devised effective technological solutions for road construction and necessary structures (bridges, ditches, crossings, etc.), while as a governor, he ensured oversight of their implementation. Alongside the physical construction, the mental image of the route began to take shape, starting with the cities, the crossing of the Kama, and the perception of the Perm Governorate as the boundary between Russia and Siberia, Europe and Asia.
Siberian Route, land communication routes, Perm Governorate, postal road guides, travelogue, cultural geography, A.N. Radishchev, K.F. Moderah
Keywords
Published
December 04, 2025
Approved after reviewing
July 05, 2025
Received
May 29, 2025
Aktamov I.G.
Abstract
This study attempts to characterize China’s educational policy in higher education after the start of reform and opening up. The article presents an analysis of the measures taken by the PRC leadership to develop the higher education system, including the development of regulatory frameworks, the adoption of documents and programs, and the implementation of large-scale projects at the end of the 20th century. The focus of the study is on issues of ensuring and improving the quality of education. It was determined that large-scale projects of the Chinese government for the development of universities made it possible to achieve formal indicators, but did not fully resolve the issue of improving the quality of education. At the same time, this problem is of an objective nature, which no country in the world can solve in the current conditions of intensive development of society and technology. This study presents preliminary results, which are an integral part of the systemic analysis of the development features of the higher education system of the PRC, which will be disclosed in the following publications.
PRC, education system, educational policy, quality of higher education
Keywords
Published
December 04, 2025
Approved after reviewing
July 05, 2025
Received
June 01, 2025
Imanova S.A.
Abstract
The main purpose of the study is to study and summarize the relations between the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China on a multilateral basis and in the context of regional energy projects. The advancement of relations between Russia, an important energy supplier, and China, one of the largest energy consumers, within the framework of international organizations – BRICS, Shanghai Cooperation Organization and APEC – is important in terms of ensuring regional energy security. In this regard, the focus of the article is to examine the characteristic aspects of the format of multilateral cooperation between the two countries, the factors that determine and hinder these relations.
The novelty of the article lies in raising the issue and reflecting the approach to energy cooperation within the framework of integration associations between Russia and China on a multilateral basis.
The article discusses the emergence of partnership relations in the energy sphere between Russia and China – members of BRICS, gives an important place to energy security in mutual cooperation, emphasizes the need for these relations in the context of sanctions against Russia and China’s growing demand for energy, and analyzes mutual interests within the organization. The article analyzes the importance of the initiatives of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization in the area of energy collaboration in terms of economic and social development including not just Russia and China, but also of Eurasia as a whole, emphasizing the importance of these ties both from a strategic perspective and from the standpoint of environmental safety. Multilateral cooperation, including under the auspices of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, creates conditions for both countries in the fight against international crises.
One of the primary priorities of Russia’s energy policy is collaboration with the states of the Asia-Pacific region. The growing demand for energy resources and the importance of diversifying fuel sources, taking into account energy security in the Asia-Pacific region, are a priority in relations with APEC economies, including China. The result of the study allows us to consider that the development of energy cooperation on a multilateral basis serves regional economic security, the development of diversification policies and alternative cooperation and causes the emergence of new priority areas in this field.
multilateral cooperation, oil and gas, summit, Shanghai Cooperation Organization, BRICS, APEC, energy
Keywords
Published
December 04, 2025
Approved after reviewing
July 14, 2025
Received
June 09, 2025
Zaytsev I.V.
Abstract
The article provides a comprehensive source study analysis of the work “History of Khan Ablai” (“Nasab-nama-yi Abylai-khan”) by Akhmet Kenesarin, a direct descendant and biographer of one of the most iconic rulers of the Kazakh Khanate. The author examines the text in terms of its origin, attribution, structure, and content, determining its place within the corpus of medieval Central Asian historical writings. The study reveals the value of the source not only for reconstructing the biography of Khan Ablai and the genealogy of the Kazakh ruling houses but also for understanding the complex political processes, institutions of power, and traditions of steppe statehood in Kazakhstan in the 18th century. Particular attention is paid to the question of the reliability of the information presented in the text and its correlation with data from other synchronous sources.
Kazakh Khanate, Khan Ablai, Akhmet Kenesarin, historical source, source studies, genealogy, genealogy, steppe statehood
Keywords
July 27, 2025
Received
August 05, 2025
Approved after reviewing
December 04, 2025
Published
Filin N.A, Koklikov V.O., Ravandi-Fadai L.M., Khodunov A.S.
Abstract
The article examines Iran’s policies during World War II and how modern Iranians perceive the war. It is well-known that Reza Shah Pahlavi, a cruel and despotic ruler, cooperated closely with Hitler’s Germany ‒ so closely, in fact, that he posed a direct threat to the USSR. The Anglo-Soviet intervention subsequently led to his overthrow and the rise to power of his son, Mohammad Reza. The new authorities helped the Allies organise the supply of weapons and other goods to the Red Army through Iranian territory. While modern Iranians have a positive attitude towards their country’s contribution to the victory over Nazism and respect the Soviet people’s achievements in fighting Hitler, they mainly emphasise the negative aspects of the Allies’ presence with regard to Iranian socio-economic and demographic development, paying insufficient attention to the positive aspects.
Iran, Russia, USSR, World War II, Great Patriotic War, Victory, historical memory, lend-lease, genocide, media
Keywords
June 15, 2025
Received
July 05, 2025
Approved after reviewing
December 04, 2025
Published
Published
December 04, 2025
Approved after reviewing
July 05, 2025
Received
June 01, 2025
Dudin P.N.
Abstract
The article is devoted to the study of the complex history and multistage evolution of Mongolian institutions of public authority in the territory of Chahar during the first half of the 20th century. This period was an era of profound transformations for Inner Mongolia, affecting both the administrative-territorial structure and traditional institutions (seims, aimags, hoshuns). Using the example of Chahar, the processes of adaptation, transformation, and continuity of these institutions are analyzed under the constantly changing policy of central subordination pursued by successive Chinese governments (late Qing, Republican, Guomindang) and, during a specific period, by the Japanese side and the collaborationist regimes it created. The study traces the changes in Chahar's political and administrative status by identifying and analyzing eight successive 'polities' – from the old imperial aimag, through a special district and a province of the Republic of China, proJapanese autonomies and structures within Manchukuo/Mengjiang, to a province under communist rule. Particular attention is paid to the influence of Chahar's specific geopolitical position as a buffer zone at the junction of civilizations and an object of administrative experiments on the structure and functions of Mongolian governing bodies. Studying the dynamics of these institutions provides a deeper understanding of the mechanisms of governing multi-ethnic states and the specifics of modernization processes on the national peripheries of Eurasia.
Chahar, Inner Mongolia, Mongolian institutions of public authority, central subordination policy, Republic of China, Guomindang, Manchukuo, Mengjiang, buffer statehood
Keywords
Published
December 04, 2025
Approved after reviewing
May 21, 2025
Received
March 04, 2025
Kotyukova T.V.
Abstract
Missionary work as a form of self-promotion is inherent in all world religions. Having previously encouraged proselytism, and often actively using it in the new territories of the growing empire, in the second half of the 19th century. in Central Asia, Russia decided to abandon the use of such practices. Despite this, the Tashkent and Turkestan dioceses tried to carry out missionary work on their own, and most actively in the period from 1907 to 1917. The diocese had no staff, no money, no support from both the central and regional administrations, and there were not enough enthusiastic missionaries. At the same time, the diocese seemed to itself to be the vanguard of imperial policy in the region, a potential that the state, for some far-fetched reasons, did not want to develop and use. However, in order to compete with the “Muslim clergy” in the specific conditions of the region, the Orthodox clergy were not prepared. What kind of Orthodox missionary work was in Turkestan and whether it was at all – we will try to figure it out on the basis of the annual reports of the Turkestan and Tashkent dioceses to the Holy Synod and publications in the Turkestan Diocesan Gazette magazine.
Tashkent and Turkestan diocese, missionary work, Turkestan region, Orthodox Church, Orthodoxy, Islam.
Keywords
Published
December 04, 2025
Approved after reviewing
March 17, 2025
Received
December 16, 2024
Nasirkhodjaev I.D.
Abstract
The article examines current areas of cooperation between the Republic of Uzbekistan and the Russian Federation in the transition to a green economy. The aim of the study is to identify and analyze key areas of interaction between the two countries in the context of sustainable development, renewable energy, environmentally oriented waste management, environmental monitoring, and the creation of green jobs. The novelty of the work lies in its comprehensive approach to assessing Uzbekistan-Russia cooperation against the backdrop of contemporary challenges related to resource scarcity, the need for technological modernization, and the fulfillment of international environmental commitments. Particular attention is paid to the practical aspects of joint projects, including the modernization of hydroelectric power plants, the construction of solar power stations, the implementation of digital monitoring systems, and the exchange of expertise in waste management. The study’s results demonstrate the potential of bilateral partnership for enhancing energy security, reducing environmental impact, and facilitating the transition to a sustainable economic model.
Uzbekistan-Russia cooperation, green economy, renewable energy, waste management, green jobs, environment
Keywords
Published
December 04, 2025
Approved after reviewing
July 27, 2024
Received
June 18, 2024
Oktyabrskaya I.V., Samushkina E.V.
Abstract
The article is devoted to the evaluation of the concepts of “soft power”, “image” and “brand” based on the materials of the modern Republic of Uzbekistan. It shows the importance of the cultural, informational and ideological component in the sphere of interethnic interactions of the country. The author’s research focuses on the state cultural policy, socio-political discourse and branding practices of the republic. Focusing on multi-vector diplomacy, Uzbekistan is developing broad international cooperation, broadcasting to the world community the image of a sovereign, goodneighborly state playing a system-building role in Central Asia; positioning itself as an intermediary country connecting East and West. Variable integration models determine the specifics of the emerging soft power strategy. Apart from traditional and parliamentary diplomacy, Uzbekistan’s instruments and mechanisms of soft power include its world-famous historical, cultural and spiritual values, distinctive traditions and the development of country and regional branding based on them. The formation of brand platforms and soft power architecture is a long and complex process. Modern Uzbekistan is at the beginning of this path. Claiming to be a regional leader in Central Asia, he effectively uses cultural heritage as the basis for a positive image that serves to strengthen security and ensure sustainable development of the country and the macroregion.
Uzbekistan, soft power, cultural heritage, national image, country and regional branding
Keywords
Published
December 04, 2025
Approved after reviewing
July 10, 2025
Received
June 15, 2025
Gombozapov A.D.
Abstract
The article analyzes the transformations in the social organization of nomadic populations in contemporary Mongolia, conceptualizing the nomadic community as a form of horizontal social structure that demonstrates variable configurations of territorial and kinship-based organizational principles. The study reveals a distinct spatial differentiation in these social organizational patterns: in peri-urban zones, particularly around Ulaanbaatar, territorial principles emerge as dominant, coinciding with processes of social stratification, intensified migration flows, and progressive sedentarization among nomadic groups. Conversely, in more remote regions, traditional kinship networks maintain their structural significance, serving as crucial mechanisms for community formation that facilitate the protection of pastoral land rights, establish informal claims to grazing territories, and mediate between competing private and public land-use interests. This organizational duality reflects adaptive responses to systemic contradictions in land governance, where formal legal frameworks are frequently complemented and effectively mitigated through the persistent self-organizational capacities of nomadic households, illustrating the dynamic interplay between institutional structures and traditional social formations during Mongolia’s ongoing pastoral transition.
Mongolia, nomadic communities, principles of social organization, territoriality, kinship
Keywords
Published
December 04, 2025
Approved after reviewing
July 05, 2025
Received
June 01, 2025
Kuras L.V.
Abstract
The reason for preparing this material was an article by Batbayar Bayanbaatar, a Master of Laws at the Mongolian State University, on the pages of a Russian legal journal, which completely disavows the 1915 Agreement. Moreover, the legal document, which is 110 years old, is interpreted as «a manifestation of Russia's gross violation of the basic principles of international law». The article, dedicated to the signing of the Treaty of Kyakhta between Russia, China and Mongolia in 1915, which became the foundation of modern Mongolian statehood, analyzes the main statements of the document. At the same time, diplomatic documents are considered that became the basis for signing the Agreement. Among them are the Mongolian-Russian agreement of 1912, not recognized by the Chinese side, and the Chinese-Russian declaration of 1913, according to which Mongolia was recognized as an autonomous state under the suzerainty of China. But Mongolia did not recognize this document. Lengthy negotiations began and in 1915 a triple agreement was signed in Kyakhta, according to which Mongolia was recognized as an autonomous state under the suzerainty of China.
In addition, the article also examines the reasons for the abolition of the autonomy
Russia, Mongolia, China, statehood, Kyakhta Agreement
Keywords
Published
December 04, 2025
Approved after reviewing
April 28, 2025
Received
January 13, 2025
Bukharin M.D., Ilizarov S.S.
Abstract
The article reconstructs the biography of Russian historian, philologist, ethnographer member of the Academy of Sciences of USSR V.A. Gordlevsky (1876‒1956). Scientific activity and biographies of the scholar were extensively studied, however, until now they have not been completely reconstructed: a number of important pages in the history formation of Gordlevsky as a scholar, history of his scientific ativity requires additional research, attracting newer archival materials. The importance of addressing to Gordlevsky’s figure in the context of the history of science is explained by the fact that his scientific work is inextricably linked with the history of a number of leading institutions of Soviet science and culture, the activities of academician Gordlevsky reflect many twists and turns in the history of the Russian Empire and USSR. One of the less known sources of information on the scientific activity of V.A. Gordlevsky is the archive of the Russian State Library (Rumyantsev Museum), in which V.A. Gordlevsky worked in 1919‒1933. Academician Gordlevsky was one of those few specialists who in fact created the department of Oriental studies of Lenin Library. Despite the attraction of a significant amount of archival material, a number of issues affected by the article have not yet been answered. The reasons why V.A. Gordlevsky was forced to leave the library staff are unclear. Perhaps addressing the archives of other institutions will answer this question.
history of science, Oriental studies, Turkology, Libraries, V.A. Gordlevsky.
Keywords
Published
December 04, 2025
Approved after reviewing
July 02, 2025
Received
June 02, 2025
Published
December 04, 2025
Approved after reviewing
December 15, 2024
Received
September 13, 2024
Published
December 04, 2025
Approved after reviewing
June 17, 2025
Received
May 21, 2025
Published
December 04, 2025
Approved after reviewing
December 15, 2024
Received
September 13, 2024
The article considers the existence of historical memory in modern sculptural forms, examines the issue of changes in the methods of transmitting historical memory in connection with the development of artistic communication in contemporary art. It was revealed that one of the significant factors that influenced the methods of transmitting the theme of historical memory in sculpture is the structure of social memory, which has become more complex in the 20th and 21st centuries, in connection with historical and personal memory. Another significant factor is the changes that have occurred in art, in particular in sculpture, the morphological boundaries of which have significantly expanded, new ways of interacting with space and the viewer have appeared. The combination of these two factors manifested itself in the development of new forms of existence of historical memory in sculpture. These forms can be built on new compositional techniques based on the qualities of interactivity, immersion, processuality and site-specificity of contemporary art.
Keywords
historical memory, communication, sculpture, monumental art, interactive art, procedurality
Abstract
Podolskaya K.S.
Part III
Historical memory and problems of historical politics
Keywords
repatriation, historiography, Southern Sakhalin, Kuril Islands, history studies
The article deals with the analysis of Russian historiography exploring the process of repatriation of civilians and prisoners of war from Southern Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands after World War II. The study examines the key stages in the development of historical scholarship in this field, starting from the Soviet period, when ideologically driven approaches prevailed, and ending with contemporary research that strives for a more objective and comprehensive understanding of the events. Special attention is paid to the evolving interpretations of the repatriation of Japanese, Koreans, and indigenous peoples, such as the Ainu, as well as the influence of political and social factors on the formation of historical narratives. The aim of the article is to identify the main trends, gaps, and achievements in the study of this topic, as well as to demonstrate how researchers’ perspectives have evolved in the context of changing historical eras.
Abstract
Din Y.I.
The article is dedicated to the study of the visual image of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and its role in the informational confrontation during the Cold War. Visual representations of NATO are examined through cartoons published in the newspapers Pravda and The New York Times. The research focuses on the years 1948 to 1953, a period marked by the formation of initial perceptions of the North Atlantic Alliance. A comprehensive sample encompassing 4,382 issues allowed for the identification of 251 cartoons related to the topic of NATO. Methods of critical observation, content analysis, and comparison provided both quantitative and qualitative data regarding the caricatural representation of the organization in two distinct contexts. Differences in the quantitative expression of images and in the visual concepts of cartoons from Soviet and American publications were identified. It was determined that, despite these differences, symbols of opposition, danger, and weaponry from both sides established a “coordinate system” in which peace was marginalized. In both countries, NATO’s image contributed to the construction of identity and internal cohesion, as well as served to mobilize the population, albeit with differing ultimate objectives: in the Soviet Union, it aimed to stimulate labor activity, while in the United States, it functioned to unite allies against Soviet influence and justify NATO funding. These aspects reveal how visual means were employed to shape public opinion and manipulate perception of threats and security, underscoring the importance of visual content in the realm of informational confrontation.
Keywords
NATO, Pravda, New York Times, image, cartoons, cold war
Abstract
Klinova M.A., Melnikova N.V.
The history of the first productions of the ballet «Stone Flower», which showed Ural folklore to a wide Soviet audience, is presented in this paper. The materials of the Central State Archive of Literature and Art of St. Petersburg were the basis of the research. The task of representing regional cultures in the art of musical theater was very important in the late 1940s in the Soviet Union. Folklore material of the Ural region, which combined the components of traditional and industrial Russian culture in the imperial period, allowed us to present topical subjects. Ballet finally mastered a new space for the real solution of informational, ideological and aesthetic problems after the Second World War. The theaters of the country then joined in the development of the theme of Ural folklore by means of choreography. The basis was taken from the tales of Pavel Bazhov, which he created in the late 1930s. It was a state order for the study of folklore studies. The first experiments of creating a libretto demonstrate the sharpness of socially significant, social issues, the development of the theme of duty to the people. The play «The Stone Flower» (composer Orest Yevlakhov. libretto by Mikhail Lobodin) in the late 1940s. He was supposed to present on the stage of the Kirov Theater in Leningrad the culture of the industrial Urals of the second half of the XIX century and its socio-political dimension. Yuri Grigorovich's production will appear and demonstrate the new artistic principles of the era in 1957.
Abstract
Keywords
Soviet ballet, cultural policy, Ural region, Ural folklore, tales of Pavel Bazhov, ballet «The Stone Flower»
Sapanzha O.S
Published
December 04, 2025
Approved after reviewing
December 15, 2024
Received
September 13, 2024
Abstract
Eurasian Congress of Linguists, international scientific cooperation, linguistics, Russian as a language of science, preservation of linguistic diversity
Keywords
The article provides an overview of the First Eurasian Congress of Linguists (EACL-1), held in Moscow from December 9 to 13, 2024. The Congress was organized by the Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences with the support of the Russian Ministry of Science and Higher Education and other organizations. It was conceived as a response to the cancellation of the Permanent International Committee of Linguists (CIPL) congress in Russia. The event featured over 600 presenters from 45 countries, including leading world scholars. The program included plenary lectures, 18 thematic sections, 22 round tables, and public lectures. Special attention was paid to the role of Russian as a language of science, support for sign languages, and current issues in modern linguistics. The Congress helped strengthen international and interregional academic ties, overcome the isolation of Russian science, and served as a platform for sharing cutting-edge research.
Languages and literature of the countries of the Eurasian space
Part IV
Kibrik A.A., Mazurova J.V
References
  1. Albazinsky ostrog (2019), “Albazinsky ostrog: Istoriya, arkheologiya, antropologiya narodov Priamuriya” [Albazin Fortress: History, Archaeology and Anthropology of the Amur Region Peoples]. Novosibirsk: IAET SO RAN.
  2. Denisov, I.E. and Safranchuk, I.A. (2024), “Evraziyskoe prostranstvo v kitayskikh ofitsialnykh i akademicheskikh diskussiyakh” [Eurasian Space in Chinese Official and Academic Discourses], Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta, 17(3).
  3. Li, X. (2016), “Kitayskiy vzglyad na sozdanie evraziyskogo ekonomicheskogo prostranstva” [Chinese Perspective on Creating Eurasian Economic Space]. Moscow: Valdai International Discussion Club.
  4. Maslov, A.A. (2024), “Rossiya na Vostoke” [Russia in the East], Patria, 1(3).
  5. Melikhov, G.V. (1974), “Manchzhury na Severo-Vostoke (XVII v.)” [The Manchus in the Northeast (17th Century)]. Moscow: Nauka.
  6. Skripkar’, M.V. (2015), “Formirovanie kontseptsii “kitayskaya mechta”: ot Sun’ Yatsena do Si Tszin’pina” [The Formation of the “Chinese Dream”: From Sun Yat-sen to Xi Jinping], Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal prikladnykh i fundamental’nykh issledovaniy, (8-2), pp. 345-348.
  7. Le, Daiyuan (2007), The American Dream, the European Dream, the Chinese Dream, vol. 9, pp. 159-165.
  8. Chzhan, Czzyan`xua (2006), The Meeting and Divergence of Old and New Russia ‒ Historical Reflections on the Revival of Russia in the Perspective of Eurasianism, Education and research, no.2.
  9. Chzhu, Czzidun (2013), What is the difference between the “Chinese dream” and the “American dream”?, Partijnoe stroitel`stvo, vol.2
  10. Benjamin, C. (2018), Empires of Ancient Eurasia: The First Silk Roads Era, 100 BCE–250 CE. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Cauquelin, J. et al. (2014), Asian Values: Encounter with Diversity, Routledge, London, UK.
  12. Chen, K.-H. (2010), Asia as Method: Toward Deimperialization, Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
  13. Chu, S.C. and Liu, K.-C. (2016), Li Hung-Chang and China’s Early Modernization, Routledge, Armonk, NY.
  14. Di Cosmo, N. (2002), Ancient China and Its Enemies: The Rise of Nomadic Power in East Asian History, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  15. Duara, P. (2011), “The Discourse of Civilization and Pan-Asianism”, Journal of World History, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 99–130.
  16. Ferguson, R.J. (2018), China’s Eurasian Dilemmas: Roads and Risks for a Sustainable Global Power, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK.
  17. Griffiths, R.T. (2019), The New Silk Road: Challenge and Response, HIPE Publications, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  18. Halsey, S.R. (2014), “Sovereignty, Self-Strengthening, and Steamships in Late Imperial China”, Journal of Asian History, vol. 48, no. 1.
  19. Mahbubani, K. (2009), Can Asians Think?, Marshall Cavendish International, Singapore.
  20. Mark, R.T. (2001), “Whatever Happened to ‘Asian Values’?”, Journal of Democracy, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 154–165.
  21. Millward, J.A. (2013), The Silk Road: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  22. Miyakawa, Y. (2011), “Sun Yat-Sen and Japanese Pan-Asianists”, in *Sun Yat- Sen, Nanyang and the 1911 Revolution* (ed. Lai To Lee and Hock Guan Lee), ISEAS Publishing, Singapore.
  23. Ooi, K.B. (2015), The Eurasian Core and Its Edges: Dialogues with Wang Gungwu on the History of the World, ISEAS Publishing, Singapore.
  24. Sen, T. (2017), India, China, and the World: A Connected History, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD.
  25. Starrs, R. (2016), Asian Nationalism in an Age of Globalization, Routledge, London, UK.
  26. Szpilman, C.W.A. and Saaler, S. (2011), The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus, vol. 9, no. 17
  27. Wang, G. (2019), China Reconnects: Joining a Deep-rooted Past to a New World Order, World Scientific, Singapore.
  28. Wong, J.Y. (2011), “The British Model”, in *Sun Yat-Sen, Nanyang and the 1911 Revolution* (ed. Lai To Lee and Hock Guan Lee), ISEAS Publishing, Singapore.
  29. 王士元 (2010), 中国的语言与民族 [Online], available at: http://clhc.cuhk.edu.hk/People /Wang/part-A/zhongguoyuyanminzu2010.pdf (Accessed 14 Apr 2025).
About the author: Alexey A. Maslov, Doct. of Sci. (History), Professor, Institute of Asian and African Studies, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia, amaslov@iaas.msu.ru, ORCID 0000-0001-7337-2874
Об авторе: Маслов Алексей Александрович, доктор исторических наук, профессор, Институт стран Азии и Африки Московского государственного университета им. М.В. Ломоносова, Москва, Россия, amaslov@iaas.msu.ru, ORCID 0000-0001-7337-2874
Maslov A.A. Chinese reflections on the Eurasian idea and alternative cultural spaces in Asia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/2949-5865-2025-3-14-37
Страницы: 14–37
About the author: Alexander Yu. Petrov, Doct. of Sci. (History), Chief Researcher, Institute of World History of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 119334, Moscow, Russia, 32a Leninsky prospect; Moscow State Linguistic University; 119034, Russia, Moscow, Ostozhenka St. 38, building 1; alaska13@yandex.ru, ORCID 0000-0002-1688-4096
References
  1. Bazarov, B.V. and Kuras, L.V. (2023), “Mongolia between the Xinhai revolution (1911) and the Mongolian revolution (1921)”, Eurasian Yearbook, no. 1, pp. 336– 357. DOI: 10.22455/2949-5865-2023-1-334-355.
  2. Bolkhovitinov, N.N. (1990), Russko-amerikanskie otnosheniya i prodazha Alyaski, 1834 – 1867 [Russian-American Relations and the Sale of Alaska, 1834–1867], Nauka, Moscow.
  3. Vinkovetsky, I. (2015), Russkaya Amerika: zaokeanskaya koloniya kontinental’noj imperii, 1804–1867 [Russian America: An Overseas Colony of the Continental Empire, 1804–1867], Moscow: Novoye literaturnoye obozrenie.
  4. Grudzinsky, V.V. (2015), Velikobritaniya i ee imperiya v seredine XIX veka: liberalizm i problema modernizacii [Great Britain and its empire in the middle of the 19th century: liberalism and the problem of modernization], Chelyabinsk: Encyclopedia.
  5. Eurasian yearbook 2024, no.2. Moscow, Russia.
  6. Istoriya Russkoj Ameriki (1997), [History of Russian America (1732–1867)]: In 3 volumes / in N.N. Bolkhovitinov (ed.). Vol. 1: Foundation of Russian America (1732–1799). Moscow: International Relations.
  7. Istoriya Russkoj Ameriki (1999), [History of Russian America (1732–1867)]: In 3 volumes / in N.N. Bolkhovitinov (ed.). Vol. 2: Activities of the Russian-American Company (1799-1825). Moscow: International Relations.
  8. Istoriya Russkoj Ameriki (1999) [History of Russian America (1732‒1867)]: In 3 volumes / in N.N. Bolkhovitinov (ed.). Vol. 3. Russian America: from its zenith to its decline (1825‒1867). Moscow: International Relations
  9. Makarova, R. V. (1974), Vneshnyaya politika Rossii na Dal’nem Vostoke: vtoraya polovina XVIII v. 60-e gody XIX v. [Russia’s Foreign Policy in the Far East: the Second Half of the 18th Century to the 1860s]. Moscow.
  10. Pasetsky, V. M. (1974), Arkticheskie puteshestviya rossiyan [Arctic Travels of Russians], Moscow.
  11. Petrov, A.Yu. (2024), “On the issue of confrontation between the Russian Empire and Western powers in the Pacific North in the 18th century”, Eurasian Yearbook, no.2, pp. 356-372. DOI: 10.22455/2949-5865-2024-2-359-375
  12. Pivovar, E.I., Katagoshchina, M.V. (2024), “Harbin ‒ the capital of the Russian Far Eastern abroad in the 1920s - 1940s: some results and tasks of studying the problems”, Eurasian Yearbook, no.2, pp. 374-397. DOI: 10.22455/2949-5865-2024- 2-377-400
  13. Troitskaya, L.M. (1994), Anglo-amerikanskie otnosheniya i oregonskaya problema (1815-1846) [Anglo-American Relations and the Oregon Problem (1815-1846)], History of US Foreign Policy and Diplomacy. 1775-1877. Moscow: International Relations, pp. 179–200.
  14. Andrews, C.L. (1947), The Story of Alaska. Caldwell, p. 103.
  15. Arndt, K.L. (1990), Russian Exploration and Trade in Alaska’s Interior // Russian America: The Forgotten Frontier / Ed. by Smith B.S., Barnett R.J. Tacoma. pp. 105-106.
  16. Barratt, G. Op. cit. P. 35.
  17. Brown, J., Eccles, W. and Heldman, D. (1994), The Fur Trade Revisited: Selected Papers of the Sixth North American Fur Trade Conference, Mackinac Island, Michigan, 1991. East Lansing and Mackinac Island: Michigan State University Press/Mackinac State Historic Parks, p. 536.
  18. Cline, G. (1974), Peter Skene Ogden and the Hudson’s Bay Company. Norman. University of Oklahoma Press.
  19. Fisher, R. (1977), Contact and Conflict: Indian-European Relations in British Columbia, 1774-1890. Vancouver. p. 32.
  20. Galbraith, J.S. (1957), Hudson’s Bay Company as an Imperial Factor, 1821‒1869. – Berkeley; Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  21. Gibson, J.R. (1990), Furs and Food: Russian America and the Hudson’s Bay Company / Edited by Barbara Sweetland and Redmond J. Barnett // Russian America: The Forgotten Frontier. Published by the Washington State Historical Society, Tacoma. Washington.
  22. Gibson, J.R. (1976), Imperial Russia in Frontier America. N.Y. p. 200.
  23. Ian, Jack (2005), Fort Yukon: the Hudson’s bay company in Russian America. London; The Hakluyt Society.
  24. Mackie, R. (1997), Somerset Trading Beyond the Mountains: The British Fur Trade on the Pacific, 1793–1843. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, pp. 125–134.
  25. Mackie, R. (1993), The Hudson’s Bay Company on the Pacific, 1821‒1843. University of British Columbia, pp. 255‒310.
  26. New Perspectives on Russian-American Relations (2019), in W. Whisenhunt and N. Saul (eds.). Routledge.
  27. Pethick, D. Victoria: the Fort Mitchell Press.
  28. Pierce, R. (1990), Russian America: A Bibliographical Dictionary. Kingston Ontario.
  29. Rich, Е.Е. (1959), The History of the Hudson’s Bay Company, 1670-1870. London. vol. 2. p. 637.
  30. Rogers, J. (1999), the Hudson’s Bay Company and the Exploration of the Far Northwest 1823-1851 the University of Montana // Scholar Works at University of Montana The University of Montana. p. 2.
Об авторе: Петров Александр Юрьевич, доктор исторических наук, главный научный сотрудник Института всеобщей истории Российской академии наук; 119334, Россия, г. Москва, Ленинский проспект, 32 а; Московский государственный лингвистический университет; 119034, Россия, г. Москва, ул. Остоженка 38, стр. 1; alaska13@yandex.ru, ORCID 0000-0002-1688-4096
Acknowledgment: The study was supported by the grant of the Russian Science Foundation No. 22-18-00043-P, https://rscf.ru/project/22-18-00043/
Благодарность: Исследование выполнено за счет гранта Российского научного фонда № 22-18-00043-П, https://rscf.ru/project/22-18-00043/
Petrov A.Yu. Russia and Great Britain in the struggle for the Pacific market in the first half of the 19th century
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/2949-5865-2025-3-38-58
Страницы: 38–58
About the author: Anton D. Prudnikov, Cand. of Sci. (History), Russian State University for the Humanities, Moscow, Russia; bld. 6, Miusskaya Square, Moscow, Russia, 125047; antonyus97@mail.ru, ORCID 0009-0008-0745-8635
References
  1. Akopyan, I.R. (2011), “External Dept of Russia: retrospective and prospect”, MGIMO Review of International Relations., no. 1, pp. 284‒287.
  2. Babenko, V.N. (2003), “Russian-Ukrainian relations (1992-2002) in the works of Ukrainian researchers (Review)”, Social and human sciences. Domestic and foreign literature, Series 5: History, no. 2, pp. 78‒86.
  3. Karbivnichij, V. (2022), “Wrong Turn” [Online], available at: https://globalaffairs.ru/articles/povorot-ne-tuda/ (Accessed 28 January 2025).
  4. Mironenko, V.I. (2004), “Russian-Ukrainian relations in 1991-2002. Historiographic essay” [Online], available at: http://vimironenko.narod.ru/sci/ sci0002/sci0002.htm#p05 (Accessed 27 January 2025).
  5. Prudnikov, A.D. (2024), “The nuclear factor in Russian-Ukrainian relations in the 1990s”, RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. “Eurasian studies. History. Political science. International relations”, Series, no. 1, pp. 117‒142.
  6. Shebanova, N. A. (2013), “International obligations and assets of the former USSR: problems of division and final solution”, International law, no. 3, pp. 88‒166.
  7. Zakhov, A. S. (2015), “Russia and the CIS countries: problem of settlement of external debt of the USSR”, Historical, philosophical, political and legal sciences, cultural studies and art history. Theoretical and practical issues, no. 7‒1(57), pp. 56‒63.
Об авторе: Прудников Антон Дмитриевич, кандидат исторических наук, Российский государственный гуманитарный университет; 125047, Россия, Москва, Миусская пл., д. 6; antonyus97@mail.ru, ORCID 0009-0008-0745-8635
Prudnikov A.D. The problem of division of foreign property and payment of external debts of the USSR in relations between independent Russia and Ukraine in the post-Soviet period
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/2949-5865-2025-3-60-74
Страницы: 60–74
Об авторе: Филин Никита Александрович, доктор исторических наук, доцент; Москва, Россия, 125047, Миусская пл., д. 6; n.filin@rggu.ru, ORCID 0000-0002-4764-6939

Кокликов Владимир Олегович, научный сотрудник Центра научно-исследовательских работ РГГУ; Москва, Россия, 125047, Миусская пл., д. 6; azzuro@list.ru, ORCID 0009-0002-2035-5637

Раванди-Фадаи Лана Меджидовна, кандидат исторических наук, доцент, старший научный сотрудник Центра научно-исследовательских работ РГГУ; Москва, Россия, 125047, Миусская пл., д. 6; ravandifadai@yahoo.com, ORCID 0000-0002-7964-6335

Ходунов Александр Сергеевич, кандидат политических наук, младший научный сотрудник Центра научно-исследовательских работ РГГУ; Москва, Россия, 125047, Миусская пл., д. 6; nalim13s@mail.ru, ORCID 0009-0004-2854-0567
Acknowledgments: The study was supported by the grant of the Russian Science Foundation No. 24-28-01672 « Attitudes towards Russia in Iranian society: history and modernity », https://rscf.ru/project/24-28-01672/
Благодарность: Исследование выполнено за счет гранта Российского научного фонда № 24-28-01672 «Отношение к России в иранском обществе: история и современность», https://rscf.ru/project/24-28-01672/
About the author: Nikita A. Filin, Doct. of Sci. (History), Associate Professor, RSUH, Moscow, Russia, 125047, Miusskaya Square, Bldg. 6, n.filin@rggu.ru, ORCID 0000-0002-4764-6939

Vladimir O. Koklikov, Researcher of the Center for Scientific Research, RSUH, Moscow, Russia, 125047, Miusskaya Square, Bldg. 6, azzuro@list.ru, ORCID 0009-0002-2035-5637

Lana M. Ravandi-Fadai, Cand. of Sci. (History), Associate Professor, Senior Researcher of the Center for Scientific Research, RSUH, Moscow, Russia, 125047, Miusskaya Square, Bldg. 6, ravandifadai@yahoo.com, ORCID 0000-0002-7964-6335

Alexander S. Khodunov, Cand. of Sci. (Political Science), Junior Researcher of the Center for Scientific Research, RSUH, Moscow, Russia, 125047, Miusskaya sq., 6, nalim13s@mail.ru, ORCID 0009-0004-2854-0567
References
  1. Aliev, A.A. (2001), Iran vs. Irak: istoriya i sovremennost’ [Iran vs. Iraq: History and Modernity], Moscow University Press, Moscow, Russia.
  2. Aliev, S.M. (2004), Istoriya Irana: XX vek [History of Iran: The 20th Century], Institute of Oriental Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences, Kraft+, Moscow, Russia.
  3. Doroshenko, E.A. (1985), Shiitskoe duhovenstvo v sovremennom Irane [Shiite Clergy in Modern Iran], Nauka, Moscow, Russia.
  4. Druzhilovskiy, S.B. (2011), “Tehran Conference”, in N.M. Mamedova (ed.), Iran i Vtoraya mirovaya voyna: Collection of Articles, Institute of Oriental Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, pp. 20–27.
  5. Jalālpur, H. and Mohammadi, A. (2013), “Consequences of the occupation of Iran in August-September 1941”, Pāžuheš dar tārix, no. 4(9), pp. 153–176 (in Persian).
  6. Kondrashin, V.V., Chepikova, K. and Yakovlev, E.N. (2025), Natsistskiy genotsid slavyan i kolonial’nye praktiki [Nazi genocide of the Slavs and colonial practices], Piter, Moscow, Russia.
  7. Krasnozhenova, E.E. (2017), “Trans-Iranian transport route during the Great Patriotic War (1941–1945)”, Nauchno-tehnicheskiye vedomosti SPbGPU, Gumanitarnyye i obshchestvennyye nauki, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 27–36.
  8. Linets, S.I., Linets, A.S., Ilyasova, A.A. (2023), “Trans-Iranian Lend-Lease Route during the Great Patriotic War: Creation, Functioning, and Results of Activities”, Bulletin of the Voronezh State Pedagogical University, no. 2. pp. 119–124.
  9. Magomedkhanov, V.M. (2015), “The Expansion of Nazi Germany into Iran and the Kurdish National Liberation Movement (1930–1940s)”, Fundamental’nyye issledovaniya, no. 2. pp. 605–610.
  10. Mahdiyan, M.H. (2011), “Iran during and after World War II”, in N.M. Mamedova (ed.), Iran i Vtoraya mirovaya voyna: Collection of Articles, Institute of Oriental Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, pp. 86–91.
  11. Mamedova, N.M. (2011), “Economic potential of Iran on the eve of and during the Second World War”, Iran i Vtoraya mirovaya voyna: Collection of articles, Institute of Oriental Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, pp. 61–78.
  12. Orishev, A.B. (2006), Taynyye missii abvera i SD v Irane: iz sekretnyh dosye razvedki [Secret Missions of the Abwehr and SD in Iran: From Secret Intelligence Dossiers], Moscow Institute of Jurisprudence, Moscow, Russia.
  13. Orishev, A.B. (2016), “The Red Army, Lend-Lease and Everyday Life of Iranians”, Simvol nauki, no. 2-3 (14), pp. 27–29.
  14. Osin, V.M. (2015), “Military mission of the Red Army in Iran in 1941–1946 based on documents of the Central Archive of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation”, Archivist’s Bulletin, no. 2, pp. 27–42.
  15. Xān-Malek Yazidi, M. (1946), – Arzeš-e masāʻi-ye Irān dar jang-e 1939–1945 [Iran’s Participation and Role in World War II (1939–1945)], General Inspectorate of the Ministry of Culture, Tehran, Iran.
Filin N.A, Koklikov V.O., Ravandi-Fadai L.M., Khodunov A.S. Perception of World War II in Iran (history and modernity)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/2949-5865-2025-3-75-92
Страницы: 75–92
About the author: Ilya V. Zaytsev, Doct. of Sci. (History), Professor of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Leading Researcher, Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 107031, Russia, Moscow, Rozhdestvenka Str.,12; ilyaaugust@yandex.ru, ORCID 0000-0001-8782-6929
References
  1. Daniyarov, K. (1998), Istoriia Abylai-khana – gosudarstvennogo deiatelia, polkovodtsa, diplomata, politika [The History of Abylai Khan - Statesman, Commander, Diplomat, Politician], Almaty: Zhibek zholy.
  2. Divaev, A.A. (1905), “Mavzolei Kok-Kesene. Istoriko-arkheologicheskaia zametka” [“The Kok-Kesene Mausoleum. A Historical and Archaeological Note”], Protokoly zasedanii i soobshcheniia chlenov Turkestanskogo kruzhka liubitelei arkheologii, Vol. X, pp. 40-42.
  3. Dobrosmyslov, A. I. (1912), Goroda Syr-Dar’inskoi oblasti. Kazalinsk, Perovsk, Turkestan, Aulie Ata i Shymkent [Cities of the Syr-Darya Region. Kazalinsk, Perovsk, Turkestan, Aulie Ata and Shymkent], O.A.Portsev Printing House, Tashkent.
  4. Erofeeva, I.V., Aubekerov, B.Zh., Rogozhinskii, A.E. et al. (2008), Anyrakaiskii treugolnik: istoriko-geograficheskii areal i khronika velikogo srazheniia [The Anyrakay Triangle: Historical-Geographical Area and Chronicle of a Great Battle], Almaty: Daik Press.
  5. Ianushevich, A. (2006), Dnevniki i pis’ma iz puteshestviia po kazakhskim stepiam [Diaries and Letters from a Journey Through the Kazakh Steppes]. Pavlodar: Eco.
  6. Kasymbaev, Zh.K. (1999), “Abylai-khan i problemy kazakhskoi gosudarstvennosti (posledniaia chetvert XVIII v. Po novym arkhivnym dannym)” [Abylai Khan and the Problems of Kazakh Statehood (The Last Quarter of the 18th Century. According to New Archival Data)], in Uroki otechestvennoi istorii i vozrozhdenie kazakhstanskogo obshchestva. Materialy nauchnoi sessii uchenykh Ministerstva nauki- Akademii nauk Respubliki Kazakhstan, posviashchennoi godu narodnogo edinstva i natsionalnoi istorii [Lessons of National History and the Revival of Kazakh Society. Materials of the Scientific Session of Scientists of the Ministry of Science ‒ Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Dedicated to the Year of National Unity and National History], Almaty: Qazaqstan.
  7. Kenesarin, Akhmet. (2017), «Istoriia Kenesary Kasymova i Sadyka Kenesarina» («Nasab-name-i sultan Sadyk» – «Rodoslovnaia sultana Sadyka») Faksimile teksta, perevod, primechaniia [“The History of Kenesary Kasymov and Sadyk Kenesarin” (“Nasab-name-yi Sultan Sadyq” ‒ “The Genealogy of Sultan Sadyq”) Facsimile of the Text, Translation, Notes]. Arkheograficheskoe predislovie, podgotovka teksta, primechaniia i ukazateli I.V. Zaitseva. Moscow: Press-Buk.
  8. Kozha, M.B. (2014), Goroda i agrarnye seleniia kazakhskikh khanstv. Posledniaia chetvert XVII-XVIII vv. [Cities and Agrarian Settlements of the Kazakh Khanates. The Last Quarter of the 17th-18th Centuries], in Epistoliarnoe nasledie kazakhskoi praviashchei elity 1675‒1821 godov. Sbornik istoricheskikh dokumentov v dvukh tomakh. Tom I. Pisma kazakhskikh pravitelei. 1675‒1780 gg. [Epistolary Heritage of the Kazakh Ruling Elite 1675‒1821. Collection of Historical Documents in Two Volumes. Volume I. Letters of Kazakh Rulers. 1675‒1780], Almaty: AO Abdi kompani.
  9. Noda, Jin and Onuma, Takahiro (2010), A Collection of Documents from the Kazakh Sultans to the Qing Dynasty, Tokyo, Japan.
  10. Potanin, G.N. (1917), Kazak-kirgizskie i altaiskie predaniia, legendy i skazki [Kazak-Kyrgyz and Altai Legends, Legends and Fairy Tales], Petrograd: tip. V.D. Smirnova.
  11. Saparaliev, D.B. (1995), Vzaimootnosheniia kirgizskogo naroda s russkimi i sosednimi narodami v XVIII v. [Relations of the Kyrgyz People with the Russians and Neighboring Peoples in the 18th Century], Ploskikh, V.M. (ed.), Bishkek: Ilim.
  12. Smagululy, O., Kozha, M. and Orazaqkyzy, A. (2023), Abylai khan. Tarikhiantropologialyq zertteu [Abylai Khan. Historical-Anthropological Research], Almaty: Atamura.
  13. Suleimenov, R.B. and Moiseev, V.A. (1988), Iz istorii Kazakhstana XVIII veka: o vneshnei i vnutrennei politike Ablaia [From the History of Kazakhstan in the 18th Century: On the Foreign and Domestic Policy of Ablai], Nauka, Alma-Ata.
  14. Temirgaliev, R. (2023), Tamga. Istoriia kazakhskikh plemen [Tamga. History of the Kazakh Tribes], Almaty: MELOMAN Publishing.
  15. Tynyshpaev, M.T. (1927), “Ak-taban-shubryndy (Velikie bedstviia i velikie pobedy kazakov)” [“The Great Disasters and Great Victories of the Kazakhs”], in V.V. Bartol’du turkestanskie druz’ia, ucheniki i poklonniki. Tashkent.
  16. Valikhanov, V.V. (1984), Historical Legends about the Batyrs of the 18th Century, in Valikhanov, Ch.Ch. (ed.), Collection in 5 volumes. Vol 1. Alma-Ata: GRKSE.
  17. Valikhanov, Ch. Ch. (1985a), A Note on the Kirghiz, in Collection in 5 volumes. Vol. 2. Alma-Ata: GRKSE.
  18. Valikhanov, Ch. Ch. (1985b), Ablai, in Collection in 5 volumes. Vol. 4, 2nd ed., Alma-Ata: Glavnaia redaktsiia Kazakhskoi sovetskoi entsiklopedii.
  19. Zaitsev, I.V. (2016), “K istorii zolotoordynskikh kungratov v Khorezme i v Krymu: emir Nangutai” [On the History of the Golden Horde Kungrats in Khorezm and the Crimea: Emir Nangutai], in *Tiurkologicheskii sbornik 2013‒2014. Pamiati Sergeia Grigorevicha Kliashtornogo (1928‒2014)* [Turkological Collection 2013‒2014. In Memory of Sergei Grigorievich Klyashtorny (1928‒2014)], Moscow: Nauka- Vostochnaia literatura.
  20. Мұсабай жырау (2023), Жанқожа батыр толғауы, in Zaitsev, I.V. (transl.), AmalBooks, Almaty.
Об авторе: Зайцев Илья Владимирович, доктор исторических наук, профессор РАН, ведущий научный сотрудник, Институт востоковедения РАН; 107031, Россия, Москва, ул. Рождественка, 12; ilyaaugust@yandex.ru, ORCID 0000-0001-8782-6929
Zaytsev I.V. «The Story of Khan Ablai» («Nasab-nama-yi Abylai Khan») by Akhmet Kenesarin as a historical source
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/2949-5865-2025-3-93-108
Страницы: 93–108
About the author: Samira A. Imanova, Cand. of Sci. (History), associate professor, Azerbaijan University of Languages, Baku, Azerbaijan; bld. 134, Rashid Beibutov Street, Nasimi district, Baku, Azerbaijan, AZ1014; Lomonosov Moscow State University, bld. 27/4, Lomonosovskii prospect, Moscow, Russia, 119192; imanovas@bk.ru, ORCID 0000-0002-3454-751X
References
  1. Karlusov, V. V. and Yarkov, D. A. (2020), “Russian – Chinese cooperation in the oil industry as a driver for the development of the Russian fuel and energy sector”, in Ekonomika: vchera, segodnya, zavtra, vol. 10. no 6 A. pp. 255–266.
  2. Pivovar, E. I. (2019), Evraziyskiy integracionnyy proekt: Globalnye processy na postsovetskom prostranstve: predposylki, stanovlenie, razvitie [The Eurasian Integration Project: Global processes in the post-Soviet space: prerequisites, formation, development] Aleteya Publ., St. Petersburg, Russia.
  3. Pivovar, E. I. (2024), “The BRICS Interstate Association. Pages of history and modern times. Part 1”, RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. “Eurasian Studies. History. Political Science. International Relations” Series, no. 1, pp. 10–30.
  4. Podobova, Z. S., Popova, L.V. and Sutyrin, S.F. (2009), “Energy initiatives within the SCO and cooperation between Russia, China and Kazakhstan in the oil sector”, in Izvestiya UrGEU, 2 (24), pp.109‒115.
  5. Romanova, E.A. (2022), “The Russian – Chinese strategic partnership within the SCO on the example of energy cooperation: new approaches in the 21st century”, in Sotsialnye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya literatura. Ser. 9: Vostokovedenie i afrikanistika, no.1, pp. 115–121.
  6. Romanova, E.A. (2023), “Features of the development of renewable energy sources in the SCO member states (using the example of China)”, RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. “Eurasian Studies. History. Political Science. International Relations” Series, no. 3, pp. 79‒97.
Об авторе: Иманова Самира Абульфат кызы, кандидат исторических наук, доцент, Азербайджанский университет языков, Баку, Азербайджан; AZ1014, Азербайджан, Баку, р-н Насими, ул. Рашида Бейбутова, д. 134; Московский государственный университет им. М.В. Ломоносова, Москва, Россия; 119192, Россия, Москва, Ломоносовский пр-т, д. 27, корп. 4; imanovas@bk.ru, ORCID 0000-0002-3454-751X
Imanova S.A. Russian – Chinese energy cooperation within the framework of international organizations
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/2949-5865-2025-3-109-126
Страницы: 109–126
About the author: Innokentii G. Aktamov, Cand. of Sci. (Pedagogy), Doctor (PhD), Institute for Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan Studies of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Ulan-Ude, Russia; bld.6, St. Sakh’yanovoi, Ulan-Ude, Russia, 670047; aktamov13@gmail.com, ORCID 0000-0002-8646-1048
References
  1. Аbilekova, G.K. (2012), “KNR v epokhu reform Den Syaopina” [PRC in the era of Deng Xiaoping’s reforms], Vestnik KazNU. Seriya vostokovedeniya, no.1 (58), pp. 9–13.
  2. Andrianov, V.D. (2023), Rol’ Den Syaopina v razrabotke teorii sotsializma s kitaiskoi spetsifikoi i osobennosti sovremennoi modeli sotsial’nogo rynochnogo khozyaistva Kitaya [The Role of Deng Xiaoping in the Development of the Theory of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics and the Features of the Modern Model of China’s Social Market Economy], Rossiya: tendentsii I perspektivy razvitiya: Yezhegodnik. XXII Natsional’naya nauchnaya konferentsiya s mezhdunarodnym uchastiyem, Moskva, 14-16 fevralya 2023 [Russia: Trends and Development Prospects: Yearbook. XXII National Scientific Conference with International Participation, Moscow, February 14–16, 2023], vol. 18, part 1, pp. 17–27.
  3. Vinogradov, A.V. (2017), Modernizatsiya kitaiskoi tsivilizatsii: istoricheskaya logika formirovaniya [Modernization of Chinese Civilization: Historical Logic of Formation] // Innovatsionnye modeli I mekhanizmy upravleniya modernizatsionnym razvitiyem (komparativistskiy analiz rossiiskogo i kitaiskogo opyta) [Innovative models and mechanisms for managing modernization development (comparative analysis of Russian and Chinese experience)], Gosudarstvennyi universitet upravleniya., Izdatel’skii dom GUU, Moscow, Russia.
  4. Sachko G.V. (2018), “Pochemu skhodnye reform vysshego obrazovaniya v Rossii I Kitaye vedut k raznym rezul’tatam?” [Why do similar higher education reforms in Russia and China lead to different results?], Yevraziiskii zhurnal regional’nykh I politicheskikh issledovanii. Spetsial’nyi vypusk, no. 1 (18), pp. 75‒83.
  5. Chen’, Zhaoming (2010), “Reformirovaniye sistemy obrazovaniya v Kitaye” [Reforming the education system in China], Gumanitarniy vector, no.1, pp. 61–69.
  6. 苏永建.中国高等教育质量保障运行机制及变革研究[M] 北京:中国社会 科学出版社.
  7. 中国大学1895-1995 (1999), 个文化冲突的世界 / (加) 许美德著;许浩英 译。‒ 北京:教育科学出版社.
Об авторе: Актамов Иннокентий Галималаевич, кандидат педагогических наук, доктор философии (PhD), Институт монголоведения, буддологии и тибетологии Сибирского отделения Российской академии наук, Улан-Удэ, Россия; 670047, г. Улан-Удэ, ул. Сахьяновой, 6; aktamov13@gmail.com, ORCID 0000-0002-8646-1048
Aktamov I.G. The course to improve the quality of higher education in China: historical experience and characteristics of the main mechanisms
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/2949-5865-2025-3-127-139
Страницы: 127–139
About the author: Svetlana V. Golikova, Doct. of Sci. (History), Institute of History and Archaeology of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 620990, Russia, Yekaterinburg, S. Kovalevskaja st., 16; avokilog@mail.ru, ORCID 0000-0001-8272-4763
References
  1. Vlasova, E.G. (2015), “Travel routes and the formation of spatial imagery in Ural travel writing of the late 18th ‒ early 20th centuries”, Labirint. Zhurnal social’nogumanitarnyh issledovanij, no. 1, pp. 57‒65.
  2. Vlasova, E.G. (2023), “The Siberian Route on the literary map of the Urals: Based on materials from 18th-century Ural travelogues”, Sovremennaja nauka. Aktual’nye problemy teorii i praktiki. Serija: gumanitarnye nauki, no. 2‒2, pp.147‒150.
  3. Gorokhov, S.V. (2022), Stanovlenie Moskovsko-Sibirskogo trakta na uchastke ot Tary do Tomska. Transportnye kommunikacii i opornye punkty: konec XVII – seredina XVIII veka [The formation of the Moscow-Siberian Route from Tara to Tomsk: Transport communications and key points (late 17th ‒ mid-18th centuries)]. Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia.
  4. Desyatkova, O.V. (2014), “Imagery and cultural landscape of the Siberian Route in Vyatka Krai”, Evrazijskij sojuz uchenyh, no. 8-8, pp. 153‒155.
  5. Istomina, E.G. (2011), “Puti soobshhenija v Rossii v XVII – nachale XIX vv.” [Communication routes in Russia from the 17th to the early 19th centuries], Rossijskaja imperija ot istokov do nachala XIX veka. Ocherki social’no-politicheskoj i jekonomicheskoj istorii. Russkaya Panorama, Moscow, Russia.
  6. Kationov, O.N. (2008), Moskovsko-sibirskij trakt kak osnovnaja suhoputnaja transportnaja kommunikacija Sibiri XVIII-XX vv. [The Moscow-Siberian Route as the main land transport link of Siberia (18th–20th centuries)]. NGPU Publishing, Novosibirsk, Russia.
  7. Kationov, O.N. (2010), N.A. Radishhev i A.P. Chehov – putniki Sibiri [N.A. Radishchev and A.P. Chekhov as travelers of Siberia], Obrazy Rossii ee regionov v istoricheskom i obrazovatel’nom prostranstve, NGPU Publishing, Novosibirsk, Russia.
  8. Kationov, O.N. (2014), Moskovsko-sibirskij trakt i ego zhiteli v XVII-XIX vv. [The Moscow-Siberian Route and its inhabitants in the 17th–19th centuries]. NGPU Publishing, Novosibirsk, Russia.
  9. Korandey, F.S. (2015), Preddverie Sibiri: obrazy granicy v opisanii puteshestvij po Sibiri (vtoraja polovina XIX veka) [The threshold of Siberia: Border imagery in Siberian travel descriptions (second half of the 19th century)], Russkij travelog XVIII-XX vekov, NGPU Publishing, Novosibirsk, Russia.
  10. Korshunkov, V.A. (2023), “Where did European Russia end and Siberia begin? Spatial demarcation of Russian lands in the 18th–19th centuries and road traditions”, Istoriko-geograficheskij zhurnal, no. 2(1), pp. 98‒107.
  11. Korshunkov, V.A. (2024), “D. Mamin ‒ Siberian or Uralian? Literary evidence on where Siberia began”, Voprosy literaturey, no. 2, pp. 121‒136.
  12. Kotzebue, A. (2001), Dostopamjatnyj god moej zhizni: Vospominanija A memorable year of my life: Memoirs. Agraf, Moscow, Russia.
  13. Kuznetsova, F.S. (1985), Osvoenie suhoputnyh traktov Zapadnoj Sibiri v XVIII v. [The development of land routes in Western Siberia in the 18th century] Zemledel’cheskoe i promyslovoe osvoenie Sibiri (XVII – nachalo XX vv.), NGPI, Novosibirsk, USSR.
  14. Lebedeva, O.B. (2015), “Alter ego as an imagological object: The narrative structure of N.M. Karamzin’s “Letters of a Russian Traveler” in light of national narrative traditions”, Imagologija i komparativistika, no. 1(3), pp. 5‒28.
  15. Mamsik, T.S. (2001), Neposredstvennaja sreda obitanija sibirjakov na rubezhe XVIII-XIX vv.: narodnaja kul’tura i prosvetitel’skij reformizm [The immediate living environment of Siberians at the turn of the 18th–19th centuries: Folk culture and enlightened reformism], Opyt prirodopol’zovanija Sibiri XIX-XX vv., NGPU Publishing, Novosibirsk, Russia.
  16. Marasinova, L.M. (1985), Puti i sredstva soobshhenija XVIII v. [Routes and means of communication in the 18th century], Ocherki russkoj kul’tury XVIII v. Part 1. MGU Publishing, Moscow, USSR.
  17. Matveev, A.V. (2014), Istorija suhoputnyh soobshhenij Omskogo Priirtysh’ja (Srednevekov’e – Novoe vremja) [History of land communications in the Omsk Irtysh region (Middle Ages ‒ Modern Times)]. Nauka Publishing House, Omsk, Russia.
  18. Minenko, N.A. (1990), Po staromu Moskovskomu traktu [Along the old Moscow Route]. Novosibirsk Book Publishing, Novosibirsk, USSR.
  19. Mikhailyak, Y. (2002), Proshhanie u «mogil’nogo kamnja nadezhdy»: ural’skaja granica v vospominanijah poljakov, soslannyh v Sibir’ [Farewell at the “gravestone of hope”: The Ural border in the memoirs of Poles exiled to Siberia], Sibir’ v istorii i kul’ture pol’skogo naroda, Ladomir, Moscow, Russia.
  20. Piven, S.N. (2005), Vlijanie Moskovsko-Sibirskogo trakta na zhizn’ naselenija Zapadnoj Sibiri v XVIII‒XIX vv. [The influence of the Moscow-Siberian Route on the life of Western Siberia’s population in the 18th–19th centuries]. Dis. … kand. ist. nauk. Tomsk
  21. Ryzhenko, L.I. (2022), Velikij Sibirskij trakt: spravochnik [The Great Siberian Route: A reference book]. Siberian Route Association, Omsk, Russia.
  22. Ryzhenko, V.G. and Ryzhenko, L.I. (2023), Perm’ v kul’turno-istoricheskom landshafte Sibirskogo trakta [Perm in the cultural-historical landscape of the Siberian Route], Perm’ – 300 let v istorii Rossii, Perm State University, Perm, Russia.
  23. Chibilev, A.A. and Bogdanov, S.V. (2011), “The Europe-Asia border: History of the issue and the problem of verifying natural and cultural-historical boundaries”, Ural’skij istoricheskij vestnik, no. 2, pp. 95‒105.
  24. Sharafeev, I.M. (2015), “Settlements along the Siberian postal route (Kazan-Perm section) in A.N. Radishchev’s travel notes of 1790 and 1797”, Iz istorii i kul’tury narodov Srednego Povolzh’ja, no. 5, pp. 281‒297.
Об авторе: Голикова Светлана Викторовна, доктор исторических наук, ведущий научный сотрудник, Институт истории и археологи Уральского отделения РАН; 620990, Россия, г. Екатеринбург, ул. С. Ковалевской, 16; avokilog@mail.ru, ORCID 0000-0001-8272-4763
Golikova S.V. The Road between Europe and Asia: The formation of the Siberian Route in the Urals in the Late 18th ‒ Early 19th Centuries
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/2949-5865-2025-3-140-163
Страницы: 140–163
Об авторе: Базаров Борис Ванданович, доктор исторических наук, профессор, академик РАН, Институт монголоведения, буддологии и тибетологии СО РАН; 670047, Россия, г. Улан-Удэ, ул. Сахьяновой, 6; bazarov60@mail.ru, ORCID 0000-0001-5326-1317

Гомбожапов Александр Дмитриевич, кандидат исторических наук, Институт монголоведения, буддологии и тибетологии СО РАН; 670047, Россия, г. Улан-Удэ, ул. Сахьяновой, 6; agombozh@yandex.ru, ORCID 0000-0001-9793-2274
About the author: Boris V. Bazarov, Dr. Of Sci. (History), professor, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute for Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan Studies, Siberian Branch of the RAS, Ulan-Ude, Russia; bld. 6, Sakhyanova St., Ulan-Ude, Russian Federation, 670047; bazarov60@mail.ru, ORCID 0000-0001-5326-1317

Alexandr D. Gombozhavov, Cand. of Sci. (History), Institute for Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan Studies, Siberian Branch of the RAS, Ulan-Ude, Russia; bld. 6, Sakhyanova St., Ulan-Ude, Russian Federation, 670047; agombozh@yandex.ru, ORCID 0000-0001-9793-2274
References
  1. AT (1973), Lubsan Danzan. Altan Tobçi (Zolotoye skazaniye). Trans. from mongol, introduction, commentaries and appendices by N.P. Shastina. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russia).
  2. Atwood, C. P. (2004), Encyclopedia of Mongolia and the Mongol empire. Bloomington: Indiana University.
  3. Bacon, E.E. (1958), Obok: A study of Social Structure in Eurasia. New York: Wenner Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research.
  4. Baoyin de li gen 宝音德力根. Manguan shen yi tumote bu de bianqian 满官慎 一土默特部的变迁 [The Changes of Mongoljin-Tumed Tribe] // Menggu shi yanjiu 蒙古史研究 [The Mongolian History Studies]. 1997. T.5. Pp 177-197. (In Chinese).
  5. Enkhtsetseg, D. (2022), “Mongolchuudyn tүүh (XIV zuuny II hagasaas XVII zuun)” [History of the Mongols (from the Second Half of the 14th century to the 17th century)]. Ulaanbaatar.
  6. Gorohova, G.S. (1986) Mongol'skie istochniki o Dajan-hane [Mongolian sources about Dayan-khan] / vved., vstup. st., komment. G. S. Gorohovoj. Moscow: Nauka.
  7. Kadyrbaev, A.S. (1990), Tjurki i irancy v Kitae i Central'noj Azii XIII-XIV vv. [Turks and Iranians in China and Central Asia in the 13th–14th centuries]. Alma- Ata: “Gylyml”.
  8. Krader, L. (1963), Social Organization of the Mongol-Turkic Pastoral Nomads. Bloomington: Indiana University Publications; The Hague: Mouton and Co.
  9. Markov, G.E. (1976). Kochevniki Azii: struktura hozjajstva i obshhestvennoj organizacii. [Nomads of Asia: structure of economy and social organization]. Moscow: Moscow State University.
  10. Nүcgjed, H. N-Ө. (2002) “Čahar tүmnij үүsjel bүrjeldjel” [The origin and composition of the Čaqar people]. Tөv azijn nүүdjelchdijn ugsaatny tүүhijn asuudal. Ulaanbaatar, 2002. H. 198-209. (In Mongolian)
  11. Ochir, A. (2016), Mongol'skie jetnonimy: voprosy proishozhdenija i jetnicheskogo sostava mongol'skih narodov [Mongolian ethnonyms: questions of the origin and ethnic composition of the Mongolian peoples]. Elista: KIGI RAN.
  12. Okada, H. (1991), Origin of the Čaqar Mongols. Mongolian Studies, Vol. 14. Pp. 155–79.
  13. Oyunbilig乌厶毕力格. (2005), Kalaqin wanhu yanjiu 喀喇沁万户研究 [Research on Kharchin Tumen]. Hohhot 呼和浩特: Nei meng ge ren min chu ban she 内蒙古人民出版社. (In Chinese)
  14. Pozdneev, A.M. (1883), Mongol'skaja letopis' "Jerdjenijn jerihje": podlin. tekst s per. i pojasnenijami, zakljuchajushhimi v sebe materialy dlja istorii Halhi s 1636 po 1736 g. [Mongolian chronicle "Erdeniin Erihe": authentic. text from translation and explanations containing materials for the history of Khalkha from 1636 to 1736]. St. Petersburg: Type. Imp. Academician Sciences.
  15. Pokotilov, D.D. (1893), Istoriya vostochnykh mongolov v period dinastii Min. 1368-1634: (po kitayskim istochnikam) [History of the Eastern Mongols during the Ming Dynasty. 1368-1634: (based on Chinese sources)]. St-Petersburg: Tip. Imp. Akad. Nauk.
  16. Rykin, P.O. (2014), “Etnicheskaya identichnost' srednevekovykh mongolov kak politicheskiy konstrukt: opyt analiza istochnikov” [Ethnic identity of medieval Mongols as a political construct: an attempt to analyze sources] // Sibir' v kontekste russkoy modeli kolonizatsii (XVII - nachalo XX v.). St. Petersburg: MAE RAS.
  17. Serruys, H. (1968), The Mongols in China: 1400–1450. Monumenta Serica. Vol. 27. Pp. 233–305.
  18. ŠT (1957), Shara Tudji. Mongol’skaya letopis’ XVIII v. Svodnıy tekst, per., vved. i primech., N.P. Shastinoi. Moscow-Leningrad: USSR Academy of Sciences Publ., 1957. (In Russian)
  19. Tishkov, V.A. (2003), Rekviem po jetnosu: Issledovanija po social'no-kul'turnoj antropologii [Requiem for Ethnicity: Studies in Socio-Cultural Anthropology]. Moscow: Nauka.
  20. Tumurtseren, J. (1961), “Čaqar hjemjejeh үgijn uchir” [The meaning of the word]. SM (Some issues of Mongolian studies). Ulaanbaatar. T III. Fasc. 1. Pp. 107- 115. (In Mongolian script)
  21. Uspensky, V.M. (1860), “Strana Kukje-nor ili Cin'-haj s pribavleniem kratkoj istorii ojratov i mongolov” [The Country of Kuke-nor or Qin-hai with the Addition of a Brief History of the Oirats and Mongols] // Zapiski imperatorskogo russkogo geograficheskogo obshhestva. Po otdeleniju jetnografii. St.Petersburg. Section Two. Vol. 6. Pp. 57-196.
  22. Vladimirtsov, B.Ya. (1934), Obshhestvennyj stroj mongolov. Mongol'skij kochevoj feodalizm [The social structure of the Mongols. Mongol nomadic feudalism]. L.: Publishing House of the USSR Academy of Sciences.
Acknowledgment: The study was supported by the grant of the Russian Science Foundation No. 24-48-03025 « From the Tea Road to the Mongolian Corridor of the "New Silk Road": Historical Projections and Contemporary Interactions of Russia, Mongolia and China », https://rscf.ru/project/24-48-03025/
Благодарность: Исследование выполнено за счёт гранта Российского научного фонда № 24-48-03025 "От Чайного пути к Монгольскому коридору "Нового Шёлкового пути": исторические проекции и современные взаимодействия России, Монголии и Китая", https://rscf.ru/project/24-48-03025/
Bazarov B.V., Gombozapov A.D. Emerging Ethnic Communities in Late Medieval Mongolia: Issues of Ethnic and Political Identity
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/2949-5865-2025-3-164-176
Страницы: 164–176
Об авторе: Дудин Павел Николаевич, доктор исторических наук, доцент, Институт монголоведения, буддологии и тибетологии Сибирского отделения Российской академии наук; 670047, Россия, г. Улан-Удэ, ул. Сахьяновой, 6; dudin2pavel@gmail.com, ORCID 0000-0002-9407-8436
About the author: Pavel N. Dudin, Doct. Of Sci. (History), Docent, Institute of Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan Studies of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Ulan-Ude, Russia; bld. 6, Sakhyanova St., Ulan-Ude, Russian Federation, 670047; dudin2pavel@gmail.com, ORCID 0000-0002-9407-8436
References
  1. Abend, H. (1933), “Japanese Seek Chahar”, The New York Times, April 11, p. 13.
  2. Abend, H. (1939), “Wang to control trade on Yangtze”, The Straits Times, January 28, p. 17.
  3. Baranov, A.M. (1908), Severo-vostochnye seimy Mongolii [North-eastern Seims of Mongolia], Kharbin: Tipo-litografiya Shtaba Zaamurskogo okruga pogranichnoi strazhi. (in Russ.)
  4. Bichurin, N.Ya. (Iakinf) (1828), Zapiski o Mongolii. S prilozheniem karty Mongolii i raznykh kostyumov: dokumental’no-khudozhestvennaya literatura [Notes on Mongolia. With a map of Mongolia and various costumes: documentary and artistic literature], Vol. 1, part 1‒2, Sankt-Peterburg: Tipografiya Karla Kraiya. (in Russ.)
  5. Bichurin, N.Ya. (Iakinf) (1840), Kitai, ego zhiteli, nravy, obychai, prosveshchenie [China, its inhabitants, customs, traditions, enlightenment], Sankt-Peterburg: V tipografii Imperatorskoi akademii nauk. (in Russ.)
  6. Bogoslovskii, V.A. and Moskalev, A.A. (1984), Natsional’nyi vopros v Kitae (1911–1949) [The National Question in China (1911–1949)], Moscow: Nauka. (in Russ.)
  7. Dudin, P.N. (2021), “‘Bor’ba za «mentszyanskoe nasledstvo»’ na fone formirovaniya novogo politicheskogo poryadka v Vostochnoi Azii posle okonchaniya Vtoroi mirovoi voiny (1945‒1947 gg.)” [“The Struggle for the ‘Mengjiang Inheritance’” against the Background of the Formation of a New Political Order in East Asia after the End of World War II (1945-1947)], Trudy instituta istorii, arkheologii i etnografii DVO RAN, vol. 34, pp. 83‒94. (in Russ.)
  8. Dudin, P.N. (2023), “Instituty publichnoĭ vlasti u man’chzhuro-mongol’skikh narodov Vostochnoĭ Azii v pervoĭ polovine XX v. (chast’ 2: postimperskiĭ politicheskiĭ poryadok)” [Institutions of public authority among the Manchu-Mongolian peoples of East Asia in the first half of the 20th century. (part 2: post-imperial political order)], Politicheskaya ekspertiza: POLITEKS, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 475‒489. (in Russ.)
  9. Dudin, P.N., Beshentsev, A.N. and Bazarov, K.Yu. (2023), “Traditsionnye instituty publichnoĭ vlasti na mongol’skikh zemlyakh imperskogo i respublikanskogo Kitaya na slom epokhi (pervaya chetvert’ XX v.): prostrannaya sreda i vizualizatsiya” [Traditional institutions of public authority in the Mongolian lands of imperial and republican China at the turn of the era (first quarter of the 20th century): a vast environment and visualization], Oriental Studies, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 293‒312. (in Russ.)
  10. Engel’fel’d, V.V. (1925), Ocherki gosudarstvennogo prava Kitaya [Essays on the State Law of China], Parizh. (in Russ.)
  11. Geograficheskoe obozrenie Kitaiskoi imperii: S kart. na 4 l. i 5 pril. v tekste (1888) [Geographical Review of the Chinese Empire: With a map on 4 sheets and 5 appendices in the text], by Z. Matusovskii, Sankt-Peterburg: tip. Imp. Akad. nauk. (in Russ.)
  12. “Inner Mongolia” (1934), The Manchester Guardian, January 1, p. 8.
  13. “Inner Mongolia. Japan's political and economic experiments” (1939), Central Queensland Herald, April 13, p. 65.
  14. “Japan Creates Of Mongokuo Puppet State” (1937), The Washington Post, Mar. 17, p. 1.
  15. “Japanese drome in Inner Mongolia” (1936), The Straits Times, March 23, p. 11.
  16. “Japanese in the North. administrative committee formed” (1937), Western Argus, November 30, p. 24.
  17. “Japanese place puppet kng on Mongol throne” (1936), Chicago Daily Tribune, Junе 28, p. 1.
  18. Karta Mongolii (1925) [Map of Mongolia], izd. kommercheskoĭ chast’yu i ekonomicheskim byuro KVZhD pod obshch. ruk-vom V. I. Surina; sost. po noveĭshim materialam M. P. Andrievskiĭ, N. Yu. Stankovich i L. A. Blashkevich, Kharbin: Tipolitotsinkogr. L. M. Abramovich. [Map]. (in Russ.)
  19. Karta Tsentral’nogo i Vostochnogo Kitaya 1934 g. (1936) [Map of Central and Eastern China 1934], Sostavleno, oformleno i otpechatano 1-i kartograficheskoi fabrikoi VKT GU GSK-NKVD-SSSR Leningrad. [Map]. (in Russ.)
  20. Kitai (1950) [China], Sostavleno i oformleno Novosibirskoi kartograficheskoi fabrikoi GUGN. [Map]. (in Russ.)
  21. Kratkii obzor Kitaya: prilozhenie k «Karte Vnutrennego Kitaya» (1927) [A Brief Overview of China: Appendix to the "Map of Inner China"], Izdanie Ekonomicheskogo Byuro Kitaiskoi Vostochnoi zheleznoi dorogi, Kharbin: Tipografiya Kitaiskoi Vostochnoi zheleznoi dorogi. (in Russ.)
  22. Kuras, L.V. (2015), “Mongol’skii mir v usloviyakh revolyutsionnogo protsessa v pervoi chetverti XX v.” [The Mongol world in the conditions of the revolutionary process in the first quarter of the 20th century], Vlast’ [Power], no. 8, pp. 190‒195. (in Russ.)
  23. Lattimore, O. (1938), “The Geographical Factor in Mongol History”, The Geographical Journal, vol. 91, no. 1 (Jan.), pp. 1‒16.
  24. Lebold, J. (2003), “Rethinking Guomindang National Minority Policy and the Case of Inner Mongolia”, in Chu, C. Y. and Mak, R. K. S. (eds.), China Reconstructs, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, pp. 94‒108.
  25. Marakuev, A.V. (1927a), “Vnutrennyaya Mongoliya” [Inner Mongolia], Vestnik Man’chzhurii [Manchurian Herald], no. 8, pp. 35-46. (in Russ.)
  26. Marakuev, A.V. (1927b), “Vnutrennyaya Mongoliya” [Inner Mongolia], Vestnik Man’chzhurii [Manchurian Herald], no. 9, pp. 46‒54. (in Russ.)
  27. Materialy dlya opisaniya Mongolii: otchet o poezdke v Mongoliyu v iyule – oktyabre 1912 g. General’nogo shtaba podpolkovnika Poltavtseva (1913) [Materials for the description of Mongolia: report on a trip to Mongolia in July - October 1912 by Lieutenant Colonel Poltavtsev of the General Staff], Irkutsk: Tipo-litogr. Shtaba okruga. (in Russ.)
  28. “Mongolia Has A New Flag” (1937), Queenslander (Brisbane, Qld.: 1866–1939), March 23, p. 18.
  29. Novitskii, V.F. (1911), Puteshestvie po Mongolii, v predelakh Tush’etukhanovskogo i Tsetsen-khanovskogo aimakov Khalkhi, Shilin-gol’skogo chigulgana i zemel’ chakharov Vnutrennei Mongolii... [Journey through Mongolia, within the Tushetukhan and Tsetsen-khan aimags of Khalkha, the Shilin-gol chigulgan and the lands of the Chahars of Inner Mongolia...], Sankt-Peterburg: Gl. upr. Gen. shtaba. Otd. gen.-kvartirmeistera. (in Russ.)
  30. Ordosets (1927), “Natsional’no-osvoboditel’noe dvizhenie vo Vnutrennei Mongolii” [National liberation movement in Inner Mongolia], Revolyutsionnyi Vostok, no. 2, pp. 48‒65. (in Russ.)
  31. “Paoshan falls” (1937), Malaya Tribune, September 07, p. 13.
  32. Polumordvinov, M. (1915), “Evolyutsiya mestnogo administrativnogo upravleniya v Kitae” [Evolution of local administrative management in China], Vestnik Azii, no. 33, pp. 3–43. (in Russ.)
  33. “Puppet State in Mongolia?” (1936), The Straits Times, June 30, p. 5.
  34. “Second Manchoukuo...” (1936), New York Post, June 4, p. 9.
  35. “Strategic success in North” (1937), Sydney Morning Herald, September 06, p. 9.
  36. “The war in China: major offensive towards Nanking” (1937), Western Mail, November 25, p. 61.
  37. Vladimirtsov, B.Ya. (1934), Obshchestvennyi stroi mongolov. Mongol’skii kochevoi feodalizm [The social system of the Mongols. Mongolian nomadic feudalism], Leningrad: Izd-vo AN SSSR. (in Russ.)
Acknowledgment: The study was supported by the grant of the Russian Science Foundation No. 22-68-00054 «The Manchu-Mongolian World of Inner Asia in the First Half of the Twentieth Century», https://rscf.ru/project/22-18-00043/
Благодарность: Исследование выполнено за счёт гранта Российского научного фонда № 22-68-00054 «Маньчжуро-монгольский мир Внутренней Азии в первой половине ХХ в.», https://rscf.ru/project/22-68-00054/
Dudin P.N. Mongolian Institutions of Public Authority of Central Subordination and Buffer Statehood: History and Evolution on the Example of Chahar (First Half of the 20th Century)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/2949-5865-2025-3-177-198
Страницы: 177–198
Об авторе: Курас Леонид Владимирович, доктор исторических наук, профессор, главный научный сотрудник Институт монголоведения, буддологии и тибетологии СО РАН; 670047, Россия, г. Улан-Удэ, ул. Сахьяновой, 6; kuraslv@yandex.ru, ORCID 0000-0003-4507-249X
About the author: Leonid V. Kuras, Doct. Of Sci. (History), Professor, Institute for Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan Studies SB RAS; 670047, Russia, Ulan-Ude, St. Sakh’yanovoi, bld.6; kuraslv@yandex.ru, ORCID 0000-0003-4507-249X
References
  1. Batsajxan, O. (2015), Russko-kitajsko-mongol’skij Kyahtinskij dogovor 1915 g., Izvestiya Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya «Istoriya», vol. 11, pp. 92‒102.
  2. Bazarov, B.V. and Kuras, L.V. (2023), “Mongolia between the Xinxai revolution (1911) and the Mongolian revolution (1921)”, Eurasian Yearbook, no. 1, pp. 336-357.
  3. Belov, E.A. (1998), Rossiya i Mongoliya v nachale XX v. (1911‒1915 gg.). M.: IV RAN.
  4. Dudin, P.N. (2013), “The formation and normative consolidation of the theocratic monarchy in Mongolia in 1911–1924”, Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, vol. 2, pp. 156–161.
  5. Grajvoronskij, V.V. (2015), “The Kyakhta Agreement of 1915 and Modern Relations between Russia, Mongolia and China”, Rossiya i Mongoliya,v pervoj polovine XX veka: kontseptual'nye voprosy rossijsko-mongol'skih otnoshenij (diplomatiya, ekonomika, nauka) [Russia and Mongolia in the first half of the 20th century: conceptual issues of Russian-Mongolian relations (diplomacy, economics, science)], Irkutsk: Izd-vo BGU, Ulan-Bator, pp. 94‒98.
  6. Istoria Mongolii XX vek [History of Mongolia XX century] (2007), In-t vostokovedenija RAN, Moscow, Russia.
  7. Korostovets, I. Ya. (2004), Ot Chingis-hana do Sovetskoj respubliki [From Genghis Khan to the Soviet Republic], Egment, Ulan-Bator, Russia.
  8. Kuras, L.V. (2016), Transnatsional’naya istoriya mongol’skogo mira v usloviyah revolyutsionnogo pod’ema: pervaya chetvert’ XX v. [Transnational history of the Mongolian world in the conditions of revolutionary upsurge: the first quarter of the twentieth century], in Bazarov, B.V. (ed.), Ottisk, Irkutsk, Russia.
  9. Kuz’min, S. L. (2015), “Centenary of the Kyakhta Agreement of 1915 between Russia, Mongolia and China”, Aziya i Afrika segodnya, no. 4, pp. 60‒63.
  10. Russko-kitajskie otnosheniya. 1689‒1916. Oficial'nye dokumenty [Russian- Chinese relations. 1689-1916. Official documents] (1958), Izd-vo vostochnoj lit-ry, Moscow, pp. 102-105.
  11. Selivanov, I. N. (2001), “China in 1914‒1925”, Novejshaja istorija stran Azii i Afriki, XX vek: Uchebnik dlja studentov vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij: V 2 ch. Chast' 1: 1900—1945 / [Modern history of Asian and African countries, XX century], Part 1, in Rodriges, A. M. (ed.), Vlados, Moscow, pp. 88‒101.
  12. Батсайхан О. (2007), Монголын тусгаар тогтнол ба Хятад, Орос Монгол гурван ул-сын 1915 оны Хиагтын гэрээ (1911‒1916). Улаанбаатар: Монгол Улсын Шинжлэх Ухааны Академи, 2007а. 160 с. (на монг. яз.).
Acknowledgment: The study was supported by the grant of the Russian Science Foundation No. 22-68-00054 «The Manchu-Mongolian World of Inner Asia in the First Half of the Twentieth Century», https://rscf.ru/project/22-18-00043/
Благодарность: Исследование выполнено за счёт гранта Российского научного фонда № 22-68-00054 «Маньчжуро-монгольский мир Внутренней Азии в первой половине ХХ в.», https://rscf.ru/project/22-68-00054/
Kuras L.V. 1915: the autonomous status of Mongolia as the foundation of statehood (on the 110th anniversary of the Treaty of Kyakhta)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/2949-5865-2025-3-199-214
Страницы: 199–214
Об авторе: Гомбожапов Александр Дмитриевич, кандидат исторических наук, Институт монголоведения, буддологии и тибетологии СО РАН; 670047, Россия, г. Улан-Удэ, ул. Сахьяновой, 6; agombozh@yandex.ru, ORCID 0000-0001-9793-2274
About the author: Alexandr D. Gombozhavov, Cand. of Sci. (History), Institute for Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan Studies, Siberian Branch of the RAS, Ulan-Ude, Russia; bld. 6, Sakhyanova St., Ulan-Ude, Russian Federation, 670047; agombozh@yandex.ru, ORCID 0000-0001-9793-2274
References
  1. Badaraev, D.D. (2013), “Modernizacija mongol’skogo obshhestva: social’nye aspekty” [Modernization of Mongolian Society: Social Aspects], Vlast’, no. 2, pp. 188‒191.
  2. Bondarenko, D.M. (2012), Kinship and Territoriality Principles in the Organization of Society and the Phenomenon of the State, in Rannie formy politicheskih system, pp. 99‒134.
  3. Grajvoronskij, V.V. (2007), “Reformy v social’noj sfere sovremennoj Mongolii” [Reforms in the Social Sphere of Modern Mongolia], IV RAN, Moscow.
  4. Grajvoronskij, V.V. (2017), Mongoliya v nachale XXI v. (politika, e`konomika, obshhestvo) [Mongolia at the Beginning of the 21st Century (Politics, Economics, Society)], IV RAN, Moscow.
  5. Gudkov, L. and Dubin, B. (2003), “Institucional’nye deficity kak problema postsovetskogo obshhestva” [Institutional deficits as a problem of post-Soviet society], Monitoring obshhestvennogo mnenija: jekonomicheskie i social’nye peremeny, no. 3. Pp. 33‒52.
  6. Kradin, N.N. (2016), “Processy transformacij skotovodcheskogo hozjajstva v Tuve i Zabajkal’e na rubezhe XX–XXI vv.” [Processes of Transformation of Livestock Farming in Tuva and Transbaikalia at the Turn of the 20th–21st centuries], Etnograficheskoe obozrenie, no. 2, pp. 8‒27.
  7. Kradin, N.N. (2017), “Mir kochevnikov i skotovodov v nachale milleniuma: strategii vyzhivanija v postsocialisticheskom mire” [The World of Nomads and Pastoralists at the Beginning of the Millennium: Survival Strategies in the Post- Socialist World]. XII Congress of Anthropologists and Ethnologists of Russia: The Mission of Anthropology and Ethnology: Scientific Traditions and Modern Challenges. Moscow, Izhevsk: IAE RAS, UIIYaL UB RAS, pp. 24–27.
  8. Markov, G.E. (1976), “Kochevniki Azii” [Nomads of Asia], Moscow: Moscow State University.
  9. Rodionov, V.A. (2016), “Mongolija na rubezhe XX-XXI vv.: sluchaĭ postsocialisticheskoĭ transformacii” [Mongolia at the Turn of the 20th-21st Centuries: A Case of Post-Socialist Transformation], Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology, no. 3, pp. 138‒159.
  10. Simukov, A. D. (2007), “Trudy o Mongolii i dlya Mongolii. Sobranie sochinenii” [Works about Mongolia and for Mongolia: Collected works] (Vol. 1, Issue 66) [Compiled by Y. Konagaya, S. Bayaraa, & I. Lkhagvasuren], Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.
  11. Khazanov, A. M. (2008), Kochevniki i vneshnij mir [Nomads and the outside world], SPb: Filologicheskij fakul’tet SPbGU.
  12. Barcus, H.R. (2018), Contested Space, Contested Livelihoods: A Review of Mongolia’s Pastureland Management and Land‐Tenure Reform, Geographical Review, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 138‒157.
  13. Bold, B.-O. (1996), Socio-Economic Segmentation: Khot-ail in Nomadic Livestock Keeping of Mongolia, Nomadic Peoples, no. 39, pp. 69‒86.
  14. Humphrey, C. & Sneath D. (1999), The End of Nomadism? Society, State, and the Environment in Inner Asia, Durham: Duke University Press.
  15. Janzen, J. (2009), “Changes in the Mongolia Pastoral Economy During the Transformation Period”, Nomadic Studies, no. 16, pp. 7–16.
  16. Sholz, F. (2008), Nomadism: A Socioecological Mode of Culture, Ulaanbaatar: International Institute of the Study of Nomadic Civilizations.
  17. Sneath, D. (2003), Land use, the environment and development in post-socialist Mongolia, Oxford Development Studies, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 441‒459.
  18. Sneath, D. (2018), Mongolia remade. Post-socialist National Culture, Political Economy, and Cosmopolitics, Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press.
Acknowledgment: The study was supported by the grant of the Russian Science Foundation No. 24-28-01333 «Territoriality vs. Kinship: Principles of Organization of a Nomadic Community in Modern Mongolia», https://rscf.ru/project/24-28-01333/
Благодарность: Исследование выполнено за счёт гранта Российского научного фонда № 24-28-01333 «Территориальность" vs "Родство": принципы организации кочевой общины современной Монголии», https://rscf.ru/project/24-28-01333/
Gombozapov A.D. Territoriality and Kinship: Principles of Social Organization in Contemporary Mongolian Nomadic Communities
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/2949-5865-2025-3-215-227
Страницы: 215–227
Об авторе: Котюкова Татьяна Викторовна, кандидат исторических наук, доцент, Институт всеобщей истории Российской академии наук; 119334, Россия, г. Москва, Ленинский пр-т., 32а; kotyukovat@mail.ru, ORCID 0000-0001-5741-7905
About the author: Tatyana V. Kotyukova, Cand. of Sci. (History), associate professor, Institute of General History of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 119334, Moscow, Leninsky Prospekt, 32а, kotyukovat@mail.ru, ORCID 0000-0001-5741-7905
References
  1. Aleksey, yepiskop (1910), Sovremennoye dvizheniye v srede russkikh musul’man [Modern movement among Russian Muslims], Tsentral’naya tipografiya, Kazan’, Russia.
  2. Arapov, D. (2004), Sistema gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniya islama v Rossiyskoy imperii (poslednyaya tret’ XVIII – nachalo XX v.) [The system of state regulation of Islam in the Russian Empire (last third of the 18th – beginning of the 20th century)], MPGU, Moscow, Russia.
  3. Asanova, S. (2012), History of the Orthodox Church in Central Asia (second half of the 19th – early 20th centuries), Ph.D. Thesis, Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
  4. Belov, Yu. (1999), Government policy towards non-Orthodox religions in Russia in 1905–1917, Ph.D. Thesis, S.-Peterburg, Russia.
  5. Volkov, I. (2010), Missionary activity of the Orthodox Church on the national outskirts of the Russian Empire (using the example of Turkestan in the second half of the 19th – early 20th centuries), Vestnik RUDN. Seriya Istoriya Rossii. No. 1, рр. 146–154.
  6. Dobrosmyslov, A. (1912), Tashkent v proshlom i nastoyashchem. Istoricheskiy ocherk [Tashkent in the past and present. Historical essay], Elektroparovaya tipolitografiya O.A. Portseva, Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
  7. Yefimov, A. (2007), Ocherki po istorii missionerstva Russkoy Pravoslavnoy Tserkvi, [Essays on the history of missionary work of the Russian Orthodox Church], Izdatel’stvo PSTGU, Moscow, Russia.
  8. Rossiya i musul’manskiy mir: Inakovost’ kak problema [Russia and the Muslim World: Otherness as a Problem] (2010), in Smirnov, A.V. (ed.),Yazyki slavyanskikh kul’tur, Moscow, Russia.
  9. Imperatorskaya Rossiya i musul’manskiy mir (konets XVIII — nachalo XX v.) [Imperial Russia and the Muslim world (late 18th – early 20th century).] (2006), Natalis, Moscow, Russia. 2006.
  10. Iz istorii natsional’noy politiki tsarizma [From the history of the national policy of tsarism], Krasnyy arkhiv, vol. 4 (35), рр. 107–127.
  11. Klimovich, L. (1936), Islam v tsarskoy Rossii [Islam in Tsarist Russia], Gaiz, Moscow, Russia.
  12. Litvinov, P. (1996), Neislamskiye religii Sredney Azii (vtoraya polovina ХIХ – nachalo ХХ vv.) [Non-Islamic religions of Central Asia (second half of the 19th – early 20th centuries)], Yelets, Russia.
  13. Lysenko, Yu. (2011), Missionerskaya deyatel’nost’ Russkoy pravoslavnoy tserkvi v Kazakhstane: vtoraya polovina XIX – nachalo XX vv. [Missionary activity of the Russian Orthodox Church in Kazakhstan: second half of the 19th – early 20th centuries], D. Sc. Thesis, Barnaul, Russia.
  14. Mikhaylov, F. (1900), Religioznyye vozzreniya sredi turkmen Zakaspiyskoy oblasti // Sbornik materialov po musul’manstvu [Religious views among the Turkmen of the Transcaspian region] in Collection of materials on Islam, vol. 2, Tipolitografiya Br. Portsevykh, Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
  15. Musul’manskiye i pravoslavnyye missionery v Kazakhstane: deyatel’nost’ i rezul’taty (XIX – nachalo XX vekov) [Muslim and Orthodox missionaries in Kazakhstan: activities and results (19th – early 20th centuries)], Collection of material, Almaty, Kazahstan.
  16. Ostroumov, N. (1899), K istorii narodnogo obrazovaniya v Turkestanskom kraye. Konstantin Petrovich fon Kaufman, ustroitel’ Turkestanskogo kraya. Lichnyye vospominaniya N. Ostroumova (1877–1881 gg.) [On the history of public education in the Turkestan region. Konstantin Petrovich von Kaufman, organizer of the Turkestan region. Personal memoirs of N. Ostroumov (1877–1881)], Tipolitografiya F. i G. br. Kaminskikh, Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
  17. Proyekt vsepoddanneyshego otcheta general-ad”yutanta K.P. Kaufmana po grazhdanskomu upravleniyu i ustroystvu v oblastyakh Turkestanskogo generalgubernatorstva. 1867–1881 [Draft of the most humble report 1885 – Draft of the most humble report of Adjutant General K.P. Kaufman on civil administration and organization in the regions of the Turkestan Governorate-General. 1867–1881], Voyennaya tipografiya, S.-Peterburg, Russia.
  18. Russkaya pravoslavnaya tserkov’ v tsentral’noaziatskikh okrainakh Rossiyskoy imperii (vtoraya polovina XIX – nachalo ХХ veka) [The Russian Orthodox Church in the Central Asian Outskirts of the Russian Empire (second half of the 19th – early 20th century). Collection of documents and materials], in Lysenko, Yu.A. (ed.), AZBUKA, Barnaul, Russia.
  19. Turkestan v imperskoy politike Rossii: monografiya v dokumentakh [Turkestan in the Imperial Policy of Russia: A Monograph in Documents], Kotyukova, T.V. (ed.), Kuchkovo pole, Moscow, Russia.
  20. Turkestanskaya yeparkhiya v dokumentakh i kommentariyakh. 1867–1918 gg. [Turkestan in the Imperial Policy of Russia: A Monograph in Documents], IPK «GLOSSA», Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
Kotyukova T.V. Orthodox missionary work in Turkestan among Muslims in the early twentieth century: a dream or a utopia?
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/2949-5865-2025-3-228-248
Страницы: 228–248
Об авторе: Бухарин Михаил Дмитриевич, академик РАН, профессор, доктор исторических наук, Институт всеобщей истории РАН, Москва, Россия, Ленинский проспект 32а, 119991; michabucha@gmail.com, ORCID 0000-0002-3590-016X

Илизаров Симон Семенович, доктор исторических наук, профессор, Институт истории естествознания и техники им. С.И. Вавилова РАН, Москва, Россия, 125315, ул. Балтийская, д. 14; sinsja@mail.ru, ORCID 0000-0002-1502-2179
About the author: Mikhail D. Bukharin, full member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, professor, Doct. Of Sci. (History), Institute of World History of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, Leninsky Prospekt 32a, 119991; michabucha@gmail.com, ORCID 0000-0002-3590-016X

Simon S. Ilizarov, Doct. Of Sci. (History), professor, S.I. Vavilov Institute of the History of Natural Sciences and Techniques of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, 125315, Baltiyskaya street, 14; sinsja@mail.ru, ORCID 0000-0002-1502-2179
References
  1. Arakin, V. (1968), Vstupitel’naja stat’ja [Introduction]. Akademik V.A. Gordlevskij. Izbrannye sochinenija. IV tom. Etnografija. Istorija vostokovedenija. Recenzii [Academician V.A. Gordlevsky. Selected entries. IV volume. Ethnography. History of discovery. Reviews], Moscow: Nauka, pp. 3‒9.
  2. Bazijants, A.P. (1979), Vladimir Aleksandrovich Gordlevskij, Nauka, Moscow.
  3. Ershov, A.E. (2011), Bibliotekar’ S.I. Ajzenshtadt v Rumjancevskom muzee [Lirarian S.I. Eisenstadt at the Rumyantsev Museum]. Rumjancevskie chtenija: Biblioteki i nauchnye soobshhestva: vzaimodejstvie i vzaimovlijanie: Materialy mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii: (19–21 aprelja. 2011 g.): [v 2 ch.]. Ch. 1 [Rumyantsev readings: Libraries and scientific communities: interaction and interaction: Materials of the international scientific conference: (19-21 April. 2011 g.): [in 2 h.]. PART 1], Pashkov dom, Moscow, pp. 167–169.
  4. Galiullina, S.D. (2012), Personal’nyj sostav popechitelej Orenburgskogo uchebnogo okruga [Personal stuff of the trustees of the Orenburg school district], Journal of Tomsk State University, vol. 356, March, pp. 58–61.
  5. Got’e, Ju.V. (1997), Moi zametki [My Notes], TERRA, Moscow, Russia.
  6. Gusterin, P.V. (2014), Sovetskaja razvedka na Blizhnem i Srednem Vostoke v 1920–30-h godakh [Soviet intelligence in the Middle East in the 1920s and 30s], Saarbrjukken: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.
  7. Kudrjavtsev, I.M. (1956), Rukopisnoe sobranie A.S. Norova [Manuscript Collection of A.S. Norov]. Zapiski Otdela rukopisej Gosudarstvennoj biblioteki SSSR im. V.I. Lenina [Notes of the Manuscript Department of the V.I. Lenin USSR State Library], Moscow, vol. 18, pp. 48–63.
  8. Kuznetsova, N.A. and Kulagina, L.M. (1970), Iz istorii sovetskogo vostokovedenija. 1917‒1967 [From the history of Soviet Oriental Studies. 1917‒1967], Nauka, Moscow.
  9. Majkova, K.A. (1983), Sobranie A.S. Norova [Collection of A.S. Norov], in Rukopisnye sobranija Gosudarstvennoj biblioteki SSSR im. V.I. Lenina. Ukazatel’ [Manuscript Collections of the V.I. Lenin. USSR State Library. Index], Moscow, vol. 1, iss. 1, pp. 58–67.
  10. Melnalksnis, A.I. (1974), Opisanie kitajskikh rukopisnykh knig i kart iz sobranija K. A. Skachkova [Description of Chinese manuscript books and maps from the collection of K.A. Skachkov], Nauka, Moscow.
  11. Otchet Gosudarstvennogo Rumjancevskogo muzeja za 1916–1922 gody (1922) [Report of the State Rumyantsev Museum for 1916‒1922], Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo, Moscow.
  12. Samarin, A.Ju. (2014), O redkih knigah i knizhnyh pamjatnikah [About rare books and book monuments], Pashkov dom, Moscow.
Bukharin M.D., Ilizarov S.S. V.A. Gordlevsky and the Department of Oriental studies of the Rumyantsev Museum / V.I. Lenin State Library
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/2949-5865-2025-3-249-265
Страницы: 249–265
Об авторе: Октябрьская Ирина Вячеславовна, доктор исторических наук, профессор, Институт археологии и этнографии Сибирского отделения Российской академии наук; 630090, Россия, г. Новосибирск, проспект Ак. Лаврентьева, д. 17; siem405@yandex.ru, ORCID 0000-0002-4190-9478

Самушкина Екатерина Викторовна, кандидат исторических наук, Институт археологии и этнографии Сибирского отделения Российской академии наук; 630090, Россия, г. Новосибирск, проспект Ак. Лаврентьева, д. 17; Khakassie@yahoo.com, ORCID 0000-0001-5481-3822
About the author: Irina V. Oktyabrskaya, Doct. of Sci. (History), Professor, Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 630090, Russia, Novosibirsk, Prospekt Ak. Lavrentyeva, d. 17; siem405@yandex.ru, ORCID 0000-0002-4190-9478

Ekaterina V. Samushkina, Cand. of Sci. (History), Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 630090, Russia, Novosibirsk, Prospekt Ak. Lavrentyeva, d. 17; Khakassie@yahoo.com, ORCID 0000-0001-5481-3822
References
  1. Atamanskaya, K. I. (2015), “Evolyuciya definiciya imidzha v nauchnyh issledovaniyah” [The evolution of the definition of image in scientific research], in Prioritetnye nauchnye napravleniya: ot teorii k praktike, no. 17, pp. 23–27.
  2. Chernobrovkina, N. I. (2016), “Brend i ekonomicheskaya identichnost’ regional’nyh aktorov” [Brand and economic identity of regional actors], in Krymskiy nauchnyy vestnik, no. 6, pp. 14–24.
  3. Chernyshov, Yu.G., Nazukina, M.V., Arshinceva, O.A., Malysheva, N.S., Hahalkina, E.V. and others (2024), “Dnevnik Altajskoj shkoly politicheskih issledovanij, no 40. Rol’ istoriko-kul’turnogo naslediya v formirovanii imidzhej regionov” [Diary of the Altai School of Political Studies, no 40. The role of historical and cultural heritage in shaping the image of the regions], AZBUKA, Barnaul, Russia.
  4. Grinevich P. A., Bocharova A. P., Stukal D. S. (2024), “Validnost’ indeksov «myagkoj sily»: ot vyzovov k resheniyam” [The validity of soft power indices: from challenges to solutions], in Politicheskaya nauka , no. 2, pp. 262–281.
  5. Nishanov D. B. (2008), “Deyatel’nost’ Uzbekistana v OBSKE i NATO” [Uzbekistan participation in OSEC and NATO], in Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, no. 2, pp. 90–95.
  6. Nizomova G. Sh. (2022), “Sotrudnichestvo Uzbekistana i OIS: sostoyanie i perspektivy” [Cooperation between Uzbekistan and the OIC: status and prospects], in Molodoy uchenyy, no. 49 (444). pp. 512–515.
  7. Oktyabr’skaya I. V., Samushkina E. V. (2024), “Uzbekistan: koncepciya kul’turnogo naslediya. Vektory suverenizacii i integracii” [Uzbekistan: the concept of cultural heritage. Vectors of sovereignty and integration], in Eurasian Yearbook, no. 2, pp. 482–508.
  8. Petrova E.A. (2017), “Imidzhevaya politika territorii v epokhu tsifrovykh transformatsiy” [Image policy of the Territory in the era of digital transformation], in Imidzh i marketing territoriy: opyt i perspektivy razvitiya v biznese, culture, turizme i obrazovanii. Materialy XV mezhdunarodnogo simpoziuma po imidzhelogii. Moskva: Izdatelstvo Akademii imidzhelogii, pp. 16–26
  9. Vazhenina I. S. (2012), “Brend territorii: sushchnost’ i problemy formirovaniya” [Brand of the territory: the essence and problems of formation], in Marketing v Rossii i za rubezhom, no. 2, pp. 91–101.
  10. Zaharov F.V. (2020), “Sovremennaya strategiya «myagkoj sily» Uzbekistana” [Sovremennaya strategiya «myagkoj sily» Uzbekistana], in Rossiya i musul’manskij mir, no.2, pp. 41–47.
Oktyabrskaya I.V., Samushkina E.V. Modern Uzbekistan. Cultural heritage and soft power architecture
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/2949-5865-2025-3-266-289
Страницы: 266–289
Об авторе: Насырходжаев Иброхимбек Дилшодович, Российский государственный гуманитарный университет; 125047, Россия, г. Москва, Миусская пл., дом 6, zafar1881@mail.ru, ORCID 0009-0003-7647-7841
About the author: Ibrokhimbek D. Nasirkhodjaev, Russian State University for the Humanities; 125047, Moscow, Russia, Miusskaya square, 6, zafar1881@mail.ru, ORCID 0009-0003-7647-7841
References
  1. Baltutite, I.V. (2023), «Zelenyye» rabochiye mesta v Rossii [“Green” jobs in Russia], Legal paradigm, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 147-154. DOI: 10.15688/ lc.jvolsu.2023.1.20
  2. Berdiyev, G.N. (2024), Postroyeniya ustoychivogo razvitiya pri zelenoy ekonomike v Uzbekistane [Building sustainable development in a green economy in Uzbekistan], Science and Education, no. 5(5), pp. 559-562.
  3. Butuzov, V.A. (2024), Elektrogeneratsiya stran SNG na osnove vozobnovlyayemykh istochnikov energii v 2022 godu [Electricity generation in the CIS countries based on renewable energy sources in 2022], Journal “Environment and Energy Science” (OSE), no. 2, pp. 14-39. DOI: 10.24412/2658-6703-2024-2-14-39
  4. Yurgens, I.Yu. and Romov, R.B. (2023), «Zelenaya» integratsiya i formirovaniye yedinogo ustoychivogo prostranstva razvitiya v formate YEAES [“Green” integration and the formation of a single sustainable development space in the EAEU format]. Moscow, MGIMO.
Nasirkhodjaev I.D. Cooperation of the Republic of Uzbekistan and the Russian Federation in the sphere of the green economy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/2949-5865-2025-3-290-301
Страницы: 290–301
Об авторе: Кибрик Андрей Александрович, доктор филологических наук, Институт языкознания РАН; 125009, Россия, Москва, Б. Кисловский пер. 1; aakibrik@iling-ran.ru, ORCID 0000-0002-3541-7637

Мазурова Юлия Викторовна, кандидат филологических наук, Институт языкознания РАН; 125009, Россия, Москва, Б. Кисловский пер. 1; mazurova.julia@iling-ran.ru
About the author: Andrej A. Kibrik, Doct. of Sci. (Philology), Institute of Linguistics RAS; 125009, Russia, Moscow, B. Kislovsky per., 1; aakibrik@iling-ran.ru, ORCID 0000-0002-3541-7637

Julia V. Mazurova, Cand. of Sci. (Philology), Institute of Linguistics RAS; 125009, Russia, Moscow, B. Kislovsky per.; 1mazurova.julia@iling-ran.ru
Kibrik A.A., Mazurova J.V. The First Eurasian Congress of Linguists (Moscow, December 9–13, 2024)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/2949-5865-2025-3-407-413
Страницы: 407–413
Об авторе: Подольская Ксения Сергеевна, кандидат искусствоведения, доцент кафедры искусствоведения и педагогики искусства ФГБОУ ВО «Российский государственный педагогический университет им. А.И. Герцена»; Россия, Санкт-Петербург, наб. Мойки, 48, 191186; fonpodol@gmail.com, ORCID 0000-0002-1311-909X
About the author: Ksenya S. Podolskaya, PhD of Art History, assistant professor of the Department of Art History and Pedagogy of Art, Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia; Moika Emb. 48, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation 191186; fonpodol@gmail.com, ORCID 0000-0002-1311-909X
References
  1. Apollonov, I. A. (2021), Pamyatnik v kontekste istoricheskoj pamyati [Monument in the context of historical memory], Intellekt. Innovacii. Investicii, no. 4, pp. 76‒85.
  2. Berdyaev, N.A. (2002), The Meaning of the History. New Middle Ages, Kanon+ Publ, Moscow, Russia.
  3. Kotlomanov, A.O. (2015), “Public art: the pages of history. The phenomenon of counter-monument and the crisis of memorial tradition in contemporary monumental sculpture”, Vestnik Sankt- Peterburgskogo universiteta. Iskusstvovedenie, no. 1, pp. 54–71.
  4. Lotman, Y. M. (1992), Izbrannye stati [Featured Articles], Aleksandra, Tallin, pp. 200‒202.
  5. Podolskaya, K.S. (2020), Sculpture in environmental art of the second half of the 20th - early 21st century, Ph.D. Thesis, RGPU im. A. I. Gercena. SPb., Russia.
  6. Sokolov, K.B. and Osokin, Yu.V. (2018), “Art, social memory and its mythologization”, Culture and Arts Herald, no. 4(56), pp. 58‒65.
  7. Shestakov, V. P. (2012), “Мemory as a Reality of Historical Time”, International Journal of Cultural Research, no. 1(6), pp. 29‒33.
  8. Young, J. E. (1999), Memory and counter-memory. The end of the monument in Germany, Harvard design magazine, pp. 1–10.
Acknowledgment: The study was supported by the internal grant of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education RSPU named after A.I. Herzen 4VG "Art and Everyday Life in the Integrative System of Modern Education"
Благодарность: Исследование выполнено за счет внутреннего гранта ФГБОУ ВО РГПУ им. А.И. Герцена 4ВГ «Искусство и повседневность в интегративной системе современного образования»
Podolskaya K.S. Historical Memory in Communicative Practices of Contemporary Sculpture in Eurasia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/2949-5865-2025-3-303-314
Страницы: 303–314
Об авторе: Клинова Марина Александровна, доктор исторических наук, ведущий научный сотрудник, Институт истории и археологии УрО РАН; 620108, Россия, г. Екатеринбург, Софьи Ковалевской, 16; klinowa.m@yandex.ru, ORCID 0000-0003-0725-4161

Мельникова Наталья Викторовна, доктор исторических наук, ведущий научный сотрудник, Институт истории и археологии УрО РАН; 620108, Россия, г. Екатеринбург, Софьи Ковалевской, 16; melnatvik@mail.ru, ORCID 0000-0002-0371-9729
About the author: Marina A. Klinova, Doct. Of Sci. (History), Institute of History and Archaeology, Ural Branch of the RAS; 620108, Russia, Ekaterinburg, S. Kovalevskoy st., 16; klinowa.m@yandex.ru, ORCID 0000-0003-0725-4161

Natalia V. Melnikova, Doct. Of Sci. (History), Institute of History and Archaeology, Ural Branch of the RAS; 620108, Russia, Ekaterinburg, S. Kovalevskoy st., 16; melnatvik@mail.ru, ORCID 0000-0002-0371-9729
References
  1. Block, M. (1986), Apologiya istorii ili remeslo istorika. [The apology of history or the craft of the historian], Moscow, Russia.
  2. Zhuravleva, V.I. (2024), “Russia and the USA as Significant Others in national identity discourses”, Mezhdunarodnaya analitika, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 20-45.
  3. Lopatkin, I.N. (2021), “Reconstruction of the image of the USA on the basis of content analysis of materials from periodicals of the Soviet Union 1956‒1964”, Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij. Povolzhskij region. Gumanitarnye nauki, no. 2(58), pp. 93‒107.
  4. Mazur, L.N. (2015), “Visualization of history: a new turn in the development of historical knowledge“, Quaestio Rossica, no 3, pp. 161‒178.
  5. Najafov, D.G. (1999), “Anti-American propaganda predilections of the Stalinist leadership“, Stalinskoe desyatiletie holodnoj vojny: fakty i gipotezy, Moscow, pp. 134‒150.
  6. Najafov, D.G. (1998), “Stalin’s Agitprop in the Cold War (according to the archival funds of the Central Committee of the CPSU(b) and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the USSR)”, Stalin i holodnaya vojna, Moscow, pp. 205‒227.
  7. Pechatnov, V.V. (1999), “Shooting blanks”: Soviet propaganda to the West at the beginning of the Cold War (1945‒1947)”, Stalinskoe desyatiletie holodnoj vojny: fakty i gipotezy, Moscow, pp. 108‒133.
  8. Pilko, A.V. (2008), “At the origins of the Cold War: the creation of NATO and its consequences (1947‒1955)”, Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 8: Istoriya, no. 2, pp. 22‒38.
  9. Senyavskaya, E.S. (2006), Protivniki Rossii v vojnah HH veka (Evolyuciya «obraza vraga» v soznanii armii i obshchestva) [Russia’s opponents in the Wars of the twentieth century (The evolution of the “enemy image” in the minds of the army and society)], Moscow, Russia.
  10. Fateev, A.V. (1999), Obraz vraga v sovetskoj propagande, 1945–1954. [The image of the enemy in Soviet propaganda, 1945-1954], Moscow, Russia.
  11. Fedosov, E.A. (2017), “Fascization of the enemy image in Soviet visual propaganda of the initial period of the Cold War (1946‒1964)”, Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, no. 418, pp. 163‒171.
  12. Shtompka, P. (2007), Vizual’naya sociologiya. Fotografiya kak metod issledovaniya. [Visual Sociology. Photography as a research method], Moscow, Russia.
Klinova M.A., Melnikova N.V. The image of NATO in the cartoons of Pravda and The New York Times 1948-1953
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/2949-5865-2025-3-315-349
Страницы: 315–349
Благодарность: Сапанжа Ольга Сергеевна, доктор культурологии, профессор, заведующий кафедрой искусствоведения и педагогики искусства ФГБОУ ВО «Российский государственный педагогический университет им. А.И. Герцена»; Россия, Санкт-Петербург, наб. Мойки, 48, 191186; sapanzha@mail.ru, ORCID 0000-0001-7874-2539
Acknowledgment: Olga S. Sapanzha, Doct. Of Sci. (Cultural studies), professor, head of department of history of art and art education Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia; Moika Emb. 48, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation 191186; sapanzha@mail.ru, ORCID 0000-0001-7874-2539
Об авторе: Сапанжа Ольга Сергеевна, доктор культурологии, профессор, заведующий кафедрой искусствоведения и педагогики искусства ФГБОУ ВО «Российский государственный педагогический университет им. А.И. Герцена»; Россия, Санкт-Петербург, наб. Мойки, 48, 191186; sapanzha@mail.ru, ORCID 0000-0001-7874-2539
About the author: Olga S. Sapanzha, Doct. Of Sci. (Cultural studies), professor, head of department of history of art and art education Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia; Moika Emb. 48, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation 191186; sapanzha@mail.ru, ORCID 0000-0001-7874-2539
References
  1. Balandina, N.A. and Sapanzha, O.S. (2022), «Krasny`j mak» i sovetskaya povsednevnaya kul`tura: istoricheskie ocherki k 95-letiyu baleta [The Red Poppy and Soviet Everyday Culture: Historical Essays on the 95th Anniversary of the Ballet], NP-Print, Sankt-Petersburg.
  2. Babrixin, A.A. (2015), “Bazhov's contribution to the formation of the Ural identity”, Novoe slovo v nauke: perspektivy` razvitiya, no. 2(4), pp. 46-48
  3. Belyakov, S.S. (2021), “P. P. Bazhov. Malachite casket: scientific publication”, Voprosy` literatury`, no. 5, pp. 284-289 DOI 10.31425/0042-8795-2021-5-284-289
  4. Borisova, I.I. (2010), “The first Yakut ballet "Sir Simege" - "Wild Flower", Vestnik Akademii Russkogo baleta im. A.Ya. Vaganovoj, no. 1(23), pp. 97-103.
  5. Bochkareva, O.V. (2023), “Prokofiev's Ballet work in Soviet Russia in the 1930s and 1950s”, Yaroslavskij pedagogicheskij vestnik, no. 2(131), pp. 214-224 DOI: 10.20323/1813-145X_2023_2_131_214
  6. Budrina, L.A. (2020), Malaxitovaya diplomatiya [Malachite diplomacy], Kabinetny`j ucheny`j, Moskva, Ekaterinburg, Russia.
  7. Budrina, L.A. (2023), “A casket made of Ural gems”. Image, material and function in Soviet stone-cutting art”], Ural`skij istoricheskij vestnik, no. 4(81), pp. 150-156 DOI: 10.30759/1728-9718-2023-4(81)-150-156.
  8. Vlast` (1999), Vlast` i xudozhestvennaya intelligenciya. Dokumenty` CzK RKP(b) ‒ VKP (b), VChK ‒ OGPU ‒ NKVD o kul`turnoj politike. 1917‒1953 [Power 1999 Power and the artistic intelligentsia. Documents of the Central Committee of the RCP(b) ‒ VKP (b), CHEKA ‒ OGPU ‒ NKVD on cultural policy. 1917‒1953], in Yakovleva, A.N. (ed.), Mezhdunarodny`j fond «Demokratiya», Moscow, Russia.
  9. Kak segodnya izuchat` (2020) Kak segodnya izuchat` frontiry`? Diskussiya po stat`e [How to study 2020 today How to study frontiers today?], Studia Slavica et Balcanica Petropolitana, no. 1(27), pp. 81‒105 DOI: 10.21638/spbu19.2020.105
  10. Culture of the Urals (2012), in Rozenberg, N. A., Solomin, V. P., Mosolova, L. M. and Marty`nov, V. L. (eds.), Izdatel`skij dom "Petropolis", Sankt-Petersburg.
  11. Prokofiev at the Mariinsky Theatre. On the 125th anniversary of the composer (2016), NP-print, Sankt-Petersburg.
  12. Sapanzha, O.S. (2022), “To the history of the names of the actors of the ballet F. Yarullina “Shurale”, Vestnik Akademii Russkogo baleta im. A.Ya. Vaganovoj, no. 2(79). S. 24-37.
  13. Sapanzha, O.S. (2021), "Soviet Ballet in the system of cultural diplomacy: three unrealized performances of the Kirov State Academic Opera and Ballet Theater ("The Miracle of India", "Daughter of India", "The Dancer from Calcutta")”, Journal of Modern Russian History and Historiography, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 225‒251 DOI: 10.30965/22102388-12340006
  14. Sapanzha, O.S. (2023), “The ballet "The Legend of Love" (1961) and the ancient East on the Soviet stage: a few touches to the history of creation”, Scripta antiqua. Voprosy` drevnej istorii, filologii, iskusstva i material`noj kul`tury`, vol. 11, pp. 179‒196.
Sapanzha O.S. Soviet Ballet and Frontier Studies: Representation of Traditional culture in the history of early versions of ballet based on the Ural Tales by Pavel Bazhov
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/2949-5865-2025-3-350-367
Страницы: 350–367
Об авторе: Дин Юлия Ивановна, кандидат исторических наук, Сахалинский областной краеведческий музей; 693010, Россия, Южно-Сахалинск, Коммунистический просп., 29; din.iuliia@mail.ru
About the author: Yulia I. Din, Cand. Of Sci. (History), Sakhalin Regional Museum of Local History; 693010, Russia, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Kommunisticheskiy prosp., bld. 29; din.iuliia@mail.ru
References
  1. Alin, Y.Y. (2000), “Organization of the monetary and credit system of Southern Sakhalin in the transition period (1945–1946)”, Kraevedcheskii byulleten, no. (2), pp. 127-141.
  2. Alin, Y.Y. (2001), “Development of the banking system of the Sakhalin region in 1947–1964”, Kraevedcheskii byulleten, no. (4), pp. 91-101.
  3. Alin, Y.Y. (2009), “A comparative analysis of the development of the banking and credit systems of Northern and Southern Sakhalin in 1905–1946”, Russia and the Island World of the Pacific Ocean, no. (1), pp. 101-116.
  4. Arzamaskin, Y.N. and Volkov, A.P. (2012), “Hostages of the Second World War: results of the repatriation of Soviet and foreign citizens in 1944–1953”, Vestnik Ekaterininskogo instituta. Istoriya , no.1(17), pp. 103-110.
  5. Bazarov, O.D. (1997), “Japanese prisoners of war in Buryatia (1945–1948)”, PhD thesis, Irkutsk State University, Irkutsk, Russia.
  6. Bazhenova, Z.M. and Ermak, G.G. (2018), “On the issue of the ethnicity of the population of frontier territories (based on materials from Sakhalin Island)”, Rossiya i ATR, no. (4), pp. 57-74.
  7. Belaya kniga aynskogo naroda (2019), Prosistem, Moscow, Russia.
  8. Bok, Zi Kou (1989a), “K voprosu o «problemakh sakhalinskikh koreytsev»” [“On the ‘problems of the Sakhalin Koreans’”], in Sung, Dyu Mo (ed.), Nam zhizn’ dana, Far Eastern Book Publishing House, Sakhalin Branch, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russia, pp. 3-13.
  9. Bok, Zi Kou (1989b), Sakhalinskie koreitsy: problemy i perspektivy, IMGiG DVO AN SSSR, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russia.
  10. Bok, Zi Kou (1993), Koreitsy na Sakhaline, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk State Pedagogical Institute, Sakhalin Center for Documentation of Modern History, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russia.
  11. Bondarenko, E. Yu. (1989), “«Zhestokiy russkiy plen»? (svidetel’stvuyut yapontsy)” [“’Cruel Russian Captivity’? (as testified by the Japanese)”], Problemy Dal’nego Vostoka, no. 3, pp. 204-206.
  12. Bondarenko, E. Yu. (2004), Inostrannye voennoplennye na Dal’nem Vostoke Rossii (1914–1956 gg.), Doctoral thesis, Far Eastern State University, Vladivostok, Russia.
  13. Chernolutskaya, E.N. (2004), “Trudovoye i bytovoye ustroystvo koreytsev na Sakhaline v kontse 1940-kh – nachale 1950-kh gg.” [Labor and Living Arrangements of Koreans in Sakhalin in the Late 1940s – Early 1950s], Vestnik Tsentra koreyevedcheskikh issledovaniy DVGU, no. 1, pp. 117–125.
  14. Din, Yu. (2015), “Dreams of returning to the homeland: Koreans in Karafuto and Sakhalin”, in Paichadze, S., Seaton, Ph. (ed.), Voices from the Shifting Russo- Japanese Border: Karafuto / Sakhalin, Routledge, London, P. 177–194.
  15. Din, Yu.I., (2013a), “The Social Movement for the Repatriation of Sakhalin Koreans in Japan and South Korea (1945–1991)”, Teoriia i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiia, no. (9), pp. 209-212.
  16. Din, Yu.I., (2013b), “The Problem of Repatriation of South Sakhalin Koreans (1945–1950)”, Voprosy istorii, no. (8), pp. 72-81.
  17. Din, Yu.I., (2015a), Koreiskaia diaspora Sakhalina: problema repatriatsii i integratsiia v sovetskoe i rossiiskoe obshchestvo [The Korean Diaspora of Sakhalin: The Problem of Repatriation and Integration into Soviet and Russian Society], Sakhalinskaia oblastnaia tipografiia, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russia.
  18. Din, Yu.I., (2015b), “Pervaia politicheskaia organizatsiia koreitsev Sakhalina v bor’be za repatriatsiiu na rodinu” [“The First Political Organization of Sakhalin Koreans in the Struggle for Repatriation to their Homeland”], Problemy Dal’nego Vostoka, no. (6), pp. 148-155.
  19. Din, Yu.I., (2016a), “Bok Zi Kou i ego vklad v obshchestvennoe, nauchnoe i kul’turnoe razvitie Sakhalinskoi oblasti” [“Bok Zi Kou and His Contribution to the Social, Scientific and Cultural Development of the Sakhalin Region”], in Rol’ lichnosti v istorii Sakhalinskoi oblasti, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russia, 26 September 2016, pp. 39-41.
  20. Din, Yu.I., (2016b), “Koreiskaia diaspora Sakhalina i Kuril’skikh ostrovov: problemy integratsii v sovetskoe i rossiiskoe obshchestvo: 1945–2010 gg.” [“The Korean Diaspora of Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands: Problems of Integration into Soviet and Russian Society: 1945–2010”], PhD thesis, Sakhalinskii gosudarstvennyi universitet, Vladivostok, Russia.
  21. Dragunova, L.V., (1996), “Lager’ voennoplennykh” [“Prisoner of War Camp”], Istoricheskie chteniia, no. (2), pp. 354-367.
  22. Dragunova, L.V., (2005), “Iaponskie voennoplennye na Sakhaline: istoriia i sud’by” [“Japanese Prisoners of War on Sakhalin: History and Fates”], in Sakhalin i Kurily v voinakh XX veka, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russia, 7–10 June 2005, pp. 179-187.
  23. Dragunova, L.V., (2006), “Lager’ iaponskikh voennoplennykh № 22 v dokumentakh Gosudarstvennogo arkhiva Sakhalinskoi oblasti” [“Camp for Japanese Prisoners of War No. 22 in the Documents of the State Archive of the Sakhalin Region”], in Lisitsyna, E.N. (comp.), Istoriia Karafuto glazami sakhalinskikh i iaponskikh issledovatelei [The History of Karafuto through the Eyes of Sakhalin and Japanese Researchers], Sakhalinskii gosudarstvennyi universitet, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russia, pp. 65-66.
  24. Dragunova, L.V., (2009), “Dokumental’nye istochniki po poslevoennoi istorii Sakhalina, Kuril’skikh ostrovov i russko-iaponskikh otnoshenii v Gosudarstvennom arkhive Sakhalinskoi oblasti” [“Documentary Sources on the Post-War History of Sakhalin, the Kuril Islands and Russian-Japanese Relations in the State Archive of the Sakhalin Region”], Rossiia i ostrovnoi mir Tikhogo okeana, no. (1), pp. 310-314.
  25. Dragunova, L.V., (2010), “Na sed’om ozere: istoriia lageria dlia voennoplennykh iaptsev” [“On the Seventh Lake: The History of a Camp for Japanese Prisoners of War”], Rodina, no. (9), pp. 37-39.
  26. Fedorchuk, S.P. (1994a), Polyaki na Yuzhnom Sakhaline [Poles in Southern Sakhalin], Arkhivnyy otdel administratsii Sakhalinskoy oblasti, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russia.
  27. Fedorchuk, S.P. (1994b), “Repatriatsiya polyakov s Yuzhnogo Sakhalina” [Repatriation of Poles from Southern Sakhalin], Kraevedcheskiy byulleten’, no. 2, pp. 41–51.
  28. Fedorchuk, S.P. (1996), Russkiye na Karafuto [Russians in Karafuto], Izdatel’stvo Yuzhno-Sakhalinskogo pedinstituta, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russia.
  29. Fedorchuk, S.P. (2001), “Istoriya odnoy pol’skoy sem’i na Sakhaline” [History of a Polish Family on Sakhalin], Vestnik Sakhalinskogo muzeya, no. 8, pp. 350–352.
  30. Fedorchuk, S.P. (2015), Russkiye na Karafuto [Russians in Karafuto], 2nd edn, Dal’press, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russia.
  31. Galitskii, V.P., (1991), “Iaponskie voennoplennye v SSSR: pravda i domysly” [“Japanese Prisoners of War in the USSR: Truth and Conjecture”], Voennoistoricheskii zhurnal, (4), pp. 66-78.
  32. GIASO (Gosudarstvennyi istoricheskii arkhiv Sakhalinskoi oblasti) [State Historical Archive of the Sakhalin Region], (n.d.), F. R-131. Op. 1. D. 3. 73 l.
  33. Goriaeva, T.M., (2009), Politicheskaia tsenzura v SSSR. 1917–1991 gg. [Political Censorship in the USSR. 1917–1991], 2nd ed., ROSSPEN, Moscow, Russia.
  34. Gridiaeva, M.V., (2019), “«Nepartiinoe otnoshenie»: Kuril’skie ostrova v pervye poslevoennye gody” [“’Non-Party Attitude’: The Kuril Islands in the First Post- War Years”], in Vtorye kraevedcheskie chteniia, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russia, 5–6 December 2019, pp. 243-253.
  35. Grishachev, S.V., (2019), “Iaponskoe gubernatorstvo Karafuto (1905–1945): istoriia i sotsial’naia pamiat’” [“The Japanese Governorate of Karafuto (1905–1945): History and Social Memory”], Ezhegodnik Iaponiia, no. 48, pp. 272-286.
  36. Ishchenko, M.I. (2008), “Etnokul’turnyye protsessy na ostrove Sakhalin. Konets XVIII–XX vv. (k postanovke problemy)” [Ethnocultural Processes on Sakhalin Island. Late 18th–20th Centuries (On the Problem Statement)], Ne predat’ zabveniyu, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russia, 12 November 2008, pp. 110–113.
  37. Ishchenko, M.I., (2003), “Sravnitel’nyi opyt kolonizatsii Sakhalina i Khokkaido: istoriko-etnologicheskii aspekt” [“Comparative Experience of the Colonization of Sakhalin and Hokkaido: Historical and Ethnological Aspect”], in Iaponiia i Rossiia: dialog i vzaimodeistvie kul’tur, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russia, 10–11 September 2003, pp. 81‒82.
  38. Istoriia Sakhalinskoi oblasti (1963), History of the Sakhalin Region, V.L. Poliakov (ed.), Sakhalinskoe knizhnoe izdatel’stvo, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russia.
  39. Istoriia Sakhalinskoi oblasti (1981), History of the Sakhalin Region, V.A. Golubev (ed.), Dal’nevostochnoe knizhnoe izdatel’stvo, Sakhalinskoe otdelenie, Yuzhno- Sakhalinsk, Russia.
  40. Istoriia Sakhalinskoi oblasti s drevneishikh vremen do nashikh dnei (1995), History of the Sakhalin Region from Ancient Times to the Present Day, Sakhalinskii tsentr dokumentatsii noveishei istorii, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russia.
  41. Karasev, S.V. (2002), Yaponskiye voyennoplennyye na territorii Chitinskoy oblasti, 1945–1949 gg. [Japanese Prisoners of War in the Territory of the Chita Region, 1945–1949], PhD thesis, Irkutsk State University, Irkutsk, Russia.
  42. Karasev, S.V. (2006), *Problemy plena v sovetsko-yaponskoy voyne i ikh posledstviya (1945–1956 gg.)* [Problems of Captivity in the Soviet-Japanese War and Their Consequences (1945–1956)], Izdatel’stvo Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta, Irkutsk, Russia.
  43. Karasev, S.V. (2007), *Istoriya plena: sovetsko-yaponskaya voyna i yeye posledstviya (1945–1956 gg.)* [History of Captivity: The Soviet-Japanese War and Its Consequences (1945–1956)], DSc thesis, Irkutsk State Technical University, Ulan-Ude, Russia.
  44. Karpov, V. (1997), Plenniki Stalina: Sibirskoye internirovaniye yaponskoy armii. 1945–1956 gg. [Stalin’s Captives: The Siberian Internment of the Japanese Army. 1945–1956], Kiev–L’vov, Ukraine.
  45. Karpov, V. (2004), “Repatriatsiya yaponskogo grazhdanskogo naseleniya i voyennoplennykh s territorii Sakhalina i Kuril’skikh ostrovov posle vtoroy mirovoy voyny” [Repatriation of Japanese Civilians and Prisoners of War from the Territory of Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands after the Second World War], available at: http://src -h.slav.hokudai.ac. jp/pdf_seminar /040823karpov.pdf (accessed 10 May 2021).
  46. Katasónova, E.L. (2003), Yaponskiye voyennoplennyye v SSSR: Bol’shaya igra velikikh derzhav [Japanese Prisoners of War in the USSR: The Great Game of the Great Powers], Institut vostokovedeniya RAN, Kraft+, Moscow, Russia.
  47. Katasónova, E.L. (2004), Resheniye gumanitarnoy problemy yaponskikh voyennoplennykh v otnosheniyakh SSSR (Rossiyskoy Federatsii) i Yaponii (1945–2003 gg.). Istoricheskiy aspekt [Solving the Humanitarian Problem of Japanese Prisoners of War in the Relations between the USSR (Russian Federation) and Japan (1945– 2003). A Historical Aspect], DSc thesis, Institute of Military History of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
  48. Katasónova, E.L. (2005), Posledniye plenniki Vtoroy mirovoy voyny: maloizvestnyye stranitsy rossiysko-yaponskikh otnosheniy [The Last Prisoners of the Second World War: Little-Known Pages of Russian-Japanese Relations], Institut vostokovedeniya RAN, Moscow, Russia.
  49. Kim, G.N. (1999), Istoriya immigratsii koreytsev (v 2 kn.), kn. 1 [History of Korean Immigration (in 2 books), book 1], Dayk-press, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
  50. Kim, G.N. (2006a), Istoriya immigratsii koreytsev (v 2 kn.), kn. 2, ch. 1 [History of Korean Immigration (in 2 books), book 2, part 1], Dayk-press, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
  51. Kim, G.N. (2006b), Istoriya immigratsii koreytsev (v 2 kn.), kn. 2, ch. 2 [History of Korean Immigration (in 2 books), book 2, part 2], Dayk-press, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
  52. Kim, I.P. (2009a), “Dokumenty o repatriatsii nemetskogo i yaponskogo naseleniya v tsentral’nykh, kaliningradskikh i sakhalinskikh arkhivakh” [Documents on the Repatriation of German and Japanese Populations in the Central, Kaliningrad, and Sakhalin Archives], Rossiya i ATR, no. 3, pp. 187–189.
  53. Kim, I.P. (2009b), “Repatriatsiya yapontsev s Yuzhnogo Sakhalina v poslevoyennyye gody” [Repatriation of Japanese from Southern Sakhalin in the Post-War Years], Vestnik Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. I. Kanta, no. 12, pp. 26–30.
  54. Kim, I.P. (2011), Razvitiye territoriy, prisoyedinennykh k SSSR posle Vtoroy mirovoy voyny (Vostochnaya Prussiya, Yuzhnyy Sakhalin, Kuril’skiye ostrova). 1945 – pervaya polovina 1949 g. [Development of the Territories Annexed to the USSR after the Second World War (East Prussia, Southern Sakhalin, Kuril Islands). 1945 – First Half of 1949], PhD thesis, Sakhalin State University, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russia.
  55. Kim, S.P. (2016), Yaponskiye voyennoplennyye na territorii Sovetskogo Soyuza (1945–1956 gg.) [Japanese Prisoners of War in the Territory of the Soviet Union (1945–1956)], PhD thesis, Institute of Russian History of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
  56. Kolesnikov, N.I. (1974), V odnom stroyu s rabochimi i krest’yanami [In the Same Ranks with Workers and Peasants], Dal’nevostochnoye knizhnoye izdatel’stvo, Sakhalinskoye otdeleniye, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russia.
  57. Kolesnikov, N.I. (1994), “Istoriya osvoyeniya i razvitiya Sakhalinskoy oblasti v 1947–1991 gg.: opyt i problemy” [History of the Development of the Sakhalin Region in 1947–1991: Experience and Problems], Slavyane na Dal’nem Vostoke: problemy istorii i kul’tury, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russia, 7–8 October 1993, pp. 129–140.
  58. Kondratenko, A.P. (1988), “Nekotoryye problemy istoriografii ainov” [Some Problems of Ainu Historiography], Etnograficheskiye issledovaniya Sakhalinskogo oblastnogo kraevedcheskogo muzeya, no. 6, pp. 21–36.
  59. Kuzin, A.T. (2007), Letopis’ Yuzhno-Sakhalinska. 1882–2007. Istoriya goroda so vremeni osnovaniya do nashikh dney [Chronicle of Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk. 1882–2007. History of the City from its Foundation to the Present Day], 2nd ed., Sakhalinskoye oblastnoye knizhnoye izdatel’stvo, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russia.
  60. Kuzin, A.T. (2009a), Istoricheskiye sud’by sakhalinskikh koreytsev (v 3 t.), t. 1 [Historical Fates of the Sakhalin Koreans (in 3 vols), vol. 1], Sakhalinskoye knizhnoye izdatel’stvo, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russia.
  61. Kuzin, A.T. (2009b), “Sud’by koreytsev v aspekte istoricheskogo opyta osvoyeniya Sakhalina i Kuril’skikh ostrovov” [The Fate of Koreans in the Aspect of the Historical Experience of the Development of Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands], Rossiya i ostrovnoy mir Tikhogo okeana, no. 1, pp. 269–281.
  62. Kuzin, A.T. (2010a), Istoricheskiye sud’by sakhalinskikh koreytsev (v 3 t.), t. 2 [Historical Fates of the Sakhalin Koreans (in 3 vols), vol. 2], Sakhalinskoye knizhnoye izdatel’stvo, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russia.
  63. Kuzin, A.T. (2010b), Istoricheskiye sud’by sakhalinskikh koreytsev (v 3 t.), t. 3 [Historical Fates of the Sakhalin Koreans (in 3 vols), vol. 3], Lukomor’ye, Yuzhno- Sakhalinsk, Russia.
  64. Kuzin, A.T. (2010c), “Koreytsy – byvshiye yaponskiye poddannyye v poslevoyennoy sovetskoy sisteme upravleniya na Yuzhnom Sakhaline (1945–1947 gg.)” [Koreans – Former Japanese Subjects in the Post-War Soviet System of Administration in Southern Sakhalin (1945–1947)], Vlast’ i upravleniye na Vostoke Rossii, no. 3, pp. 95–101.
  65. Kuzin, A.T. (2010d), “Koreytsy na Yuzhnom Sakhaline” [Koreans in Southern Sakhalin], Velikaya Otechestvennaya voyna: itogi i uroki, Vladivostok, Russia, 21– 22 April 2010, pp. 40–47.
  66. Kuzin, A.T. (2010e), “Problemy poslevoyennoy repatriatsii yaponskogo i koreyskogo naseleniya Sakhalina” [Problems of Post-War Repatriation of the Japanese and Korean Population of Sakhalin], Rossiya i ATR, no. 2, pp. 76–83.
  67. Kuzin, A.T. (2010f), “Transformatsiya grazhdanskogo statusa sakha
  68. Kuzin, A.T. (2010f), “Transformatsiya grazhdanskogo statusa sakhalinskikh koreytsev” [Transformation of the Civil Status of Sakhalin Koreans], Vlast’, no. 8, pp. 75–78.
  69. Kuzin, A.T. (2011), Istoriya koreyskogo naseleniya rossiyskogo Sakhalina: konets XIX – nachalo XXI vv. [History of the Korean Population of Russian Sakhalin: Late 19th – Early 21st Centuries], DSc thesis, Institute of History, Archaeology and Ethnography of the Peoples of the Far East, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, Russia.
  70. Kuz’mina, M. (1996), Plen (Yaponskiye voyennoplennyye v Khabarovskom kraye) [Captivity (Japanese Prisoners of War in the Khabarovsk Territory)], Izdatel’stvo Komsomol’skogo-na-Amure gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo instituta, Komsomol’sk-na-Amure, Russia.
  71. Kuz’mina, M.A. (1997), “Yaponskiye voyennoplennyye na Sakhaline (istoricheskaya spravka)” [Japanese Prisoners of War on Sakhalin (Historical Reference)], Vestnik Sakhalinskogo muzeya, no. 4, pp. 202–206.
  72. Kuznetsov, S.I. (1994), Yaponskiye voyennoplennyye v SSSR posle Vtoroy mirovoy voyny (1945–1956 gg.) [Japanese Prisoners of War in the USSR after the Second World War (1945–1956)], DSc thesis, Irkutsk State University, Irkutsk, Russia.
  73. Kuznetsov, S.I. (1997), Yapontsy v sibirskom plenu (1945–1956) [The Japanese in Siberian Captivity (1945–1956)], IGU, Irkutsk, Russia.
  74. Kuznetsov, S.I. (2004), “Koreytsy v Sovetsko-yaponskoy voyne 1945 g. i problema repatriatsii” [Koreans in the Soviet-Japanese War of 1945 and the Problem of Repatriation], in Sibir’ i Koreya v Severo-Vostochnoy Azii, Irkutsk State University, Irkutsk, Russia, pp. 51–52.
  75. Lankov, A. (2010), “Forgotten People: The Koreans of Sakhalin Island, 1945–1991”, Transactions of the Royal Asiatic Society – Korean Branch, vol. 85, pp. 13–28.
  76. Leonov, P.A., Pan’kin, I.V. and Belousov, I.E. (1979), Oblast’ na ostrovakh [A Region on Islands], 3rd edn, Mysl’, Moscow, Russia.
  77. Li, Ben Dyu (1976), Yuzhnyy Sakhalin i Kuril’skiye ostrova v gody yaponskogo gospodstva [Southern Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands during the Years of Japanese Rule], PhD thesis, Institute of Oriental Studies of the USSR Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
  78. Lim, S.Ch. (2018), “Iz istorii sakhalinskikh ainov – vynuzhdennykh migrantov: 1875–1948 gg.” [From the History of the Sakhalin Ainu as Forced Migrants: 1875– 1948], Etnograficheskoye obozreniye, no. 4, pp. 121–135.
  79. Lisitsyna, E.N. (2012), “Trud yaponskikh voyennoplennykh v neftyanoy promyshlennosti Sakhalina v poslevoyennyye gody” [The Labor of Japanese Prisoners of War in the Sakhalin Oil Industry in the Post-War Years], Izvestiya Rossiyskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A.I. Gertsena, no. 151, pp. 18–26.
  80. Mir posle voyny: dal’nevostochnoye obshchestvo v 1945–1950-ye gg. (2009), V.L. Larin (ed.), in The Post-War World: Far Eastern Society in the 1940s–1950s, Dal’nauka, Vladivostok, Russia.
  81. Morunova, P.A. (2018), “Usloviya soderzhaniya yaponskikh voyennoplennykh na Dal’nem Vostoke” [Conditions of Detention of Japanese Prisoners of War in the Far East], Vestnik Sakhalinskogo muzeya, no. 25, pp. 89–96.
  82. Pak, Syng U (2008), “Problemy repatriatsii sakhalinskikh koreytsev na istoricheskuyu rodinu” [Problems of Repatriation of Sakhalin Koreans to their Historical Homeland], Sakhalin i Kurily: istoriya i sovremennost’, Yuzhno- Sakhalinsk, Russia, 27–28 March 2007, pp. 277–287.
  83. Pak, Syng U (2012), “Repatriatsiya sakhalinskikh koreytsev na rodinu: istoriya i problemy” [Repatriation of Sakhalin Koreans to their Homeland: History and Problems], available at: http://siaa.ru/index.php?pg=1&id=127088&owner =1&page=4&ndat= &cd=012012&hd=3 (accessed 24 November 2022).
  84. Pak, Syng U (2019), Sakhalinskiye koreytsy v poiskakh identifikatsii [Sakhalin Koreans in Search of Identity], Pero, Moscow, Russia.
  85. Podpechnikov, V.L. (1993), “Repatriatsiya” [Repatriation], Kraevedcheskiy byulleten’, no. 1, pp. 102–118.
  86. Podpechnikov, V.L. (1996), “Yaponskoye naseleniye na Yuzhnykh Kurilakh posle Vtoroy mirovoy voyny: perechen’ dokumentov Gosudarstvennogo arkhiva Sakhalinskoy oblasti i Sakhalinskogo tsentra dokumentatsii noveyshey istorii” [The Japanese Population on the Southern Kurils after the Second World War: A List of Documents from the State Archive of the Sakhalin Region and the Sakhalin Center for Documentation of Contemporary History], Kraevedcheskiy byulleten’, no. 1, pp. 188–192.
  87. Podpechnikov, V.L. (2001), Na beregakh Sakhalina. Istoriko-kraevedcheskiye ocherki [On the Shores of Sakhalin. Historical and Local History Essays], Sakhalinskoye oblastnoye knizhnoye izdatel’stvo, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russia.
  88. Podpechnikov, V.L. (2003), “O repatriatsii yaponskogo naseleniya s territorii yuzhnogo Sakhalina i Kuril’skikh ostrovov” [On the Repatriation of the Japanese Population from the Territory of Southern Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands], Vestnik Sakhalinskogo muzeya, no. 10, pp. 257–260.
  89. Prokof’yev, M.M. (1985a), “Ayny Yuzhnogo Sakhalina” [The Ainu of Southern Sakhalin], in Kraevedy vedut poisk, Dal’nevostochnoye knizhnoye izdatel’stvo, Sakhalinskoye otdeleniye, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russia, pp. 38–42.
  90. Prokof’yev, M.M. (1985b), “Novoye ob ainakh o. Sakhalina (iz neopublikovannykh materialov B.A. Zherebtsova za 1946 g.)” [New Information on the Ainu of Sakhalin Island (From Unpublished Materials by B.A. Zherebtsov for 1946)], Etnograficheskiye issledovaniya Sakhalinskogo oblastnogo kraevedcheskogo muzeya, no. 2, pp. 5–13.
  91. Prokof’yev, M.M. (1988a), “Katalog-ukazatel’ aynskikh kollektsiy Sakhalinskogo oblastnogo kraevedcheskogo muzeya (konets XIX – pervaya polovina XX vv.)” [Catalogue-Index of Ainu Collections of the Sakhalin Regional Museum of Local Lore (Late 19th – First Half of the 20th Centuries)], Etnograficheskiye issledovaniya Sakhalinskogo oblastnogo kraevedcheskogo muzeya, no. 6, pp. 143–159.
  92. Prokof’yev, M.M. (1988b), “Sakhalinskiye ayny v 1945–1948 gg.” [The Sakhalin Ainu in 1945–1948], Etnograficheskiye issledovaniya Sakhalinskogo oblastnogo kraevedcheskogo muzeya, no. 6, pp. 65–81.
  93. Prokof’yev, M.M. (2005), Katalog kollektsiy B.A. Zherebtsova po etnografii ainov Yuzhnogo Sakhalina iz seleniya Staroaynskoye (Raytisi) za 1948 g. v sobranii Sakhalinskogo oblastnogo kraevedcheskogo muzeya [Catalogue of the Collections of B.A. Zherebtsov on the Ethnography of the Ainu of Southern Sakhalin from the Village of Staroaynskoye (Raitisi) for 1948 in the Collection of the Sakhalin Regional Museum of Local Lore], Sakhalinskiy oblastnoy kraevedcheskiy muzey, Institut naslediya Bronislava Pilsudskogo, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russia.
  94. Roon, T.P. (2020), “V labirinte istorii i politiki: sovetskiye issledovaniya sakhalinskikh ainov (1946–1949 gg.)” [In the Labyrinth of History and Politics: Soviet Studies of the Sakhalin Ainu (1946–1949)], Etnograficheskoye obozreniye, no. 4, pp. 132–149.
  95. Rossiya i strany ATR: migratsionnyye protsessy i problemy mezhkul’turnoy kommunikatsii. Aziya v Rossii (2019), S.S. Paychadze, I.A. Val’dman (eds), Russia and the Asia-Pacific Countries: Migration Processes and Problems of Intercultural Communication. Asia in Russia, Izd-vo NGTU, Novosibirsk, Russia.
  96. Savel’yeva, E.I. (1996), “Istoriya Grazhdanskogo upravleniya na Yuzhnom Sakhaline i Kuril’skikh ostrovakh v dokumentakh Gosudarstvennogo arkhiva Sakhalinskoy oblasti” [The History of the Civil Administration in Southern Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands in the Documents of the State Archive of the Sakhalin Region], Istoricheskiye chteniya, no. 2, pp. 347–354.
  97. Savel’yeva, E.I. (2002), “Novaya zhizn’” [New Life], Kraevedcheskiy byulleten’, no. 3, pp. 126–135.
  98. Savel’yeva, E.I. (2003), “Politika ideologicheskikh kontaktov na yuzhnom Sakhaline v 1945–1948 gg.” [The Policy of Ideological Contacts in Southern Sakhalin in 1945–1948], Dal’niy Vostok Rossii v sisteme mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy v Aziatsko-Tikhookeanskom regione: istoriya, ekonomika, kul’tura, Vladivostok, Russia, 22–23 September 2003, pp. 456–462.
  99. Savel’yeva, E.I. (2005), “Obshchestvenno-politicheskaya zhizn’ na Yuzhnom Sakhaline v poslevoyennyy period (1945–1950 gg.)” [Socio-Political Life in Southern Sakhalin in the Post-War Period (1945–1950)], Sakhalin i Kurily v voynakh XX v., Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russia, 7–10 June 2005, pp. 243–253.
  100. Savel’yeva, E.I. (2007), “Sakhalinskaya kul’tura: v nachale novogo puti (vtoraya polovina 1940-kh –1950-ye gg.)” [Sakhalin Culture: At the Beginning of a New Path (Second Half of the 1940s–1950s)], Sakhalin i Kurily: istoriya i sovremennost’, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russia, 27–28 March 2007, pp. 233–241.
  101. Savel’yeva, E.I. (2009), “Istoriya Grazhdanskogo upravleniya na Yuzhnom Sakhaline i Kuril’skikh ostrovakh v dokumentakh Gosudarstvennogo arkhiva Sakhalinskoy oblasti. 1945–1947 gg.” [The History of the Civil Administration in Southern Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands in the Documents of the State Archive of the Sakhalin Region. 1945–1947], Rossiya i ostrovnoy mir Tikhogo okeana, no. 1, pp. 67–72.
  102. Savel’yeva, E.I. (2012), Ot voyny k miru (grazhdanskoye upravleniye na Yuzhnom Sakhaline i Kuril’skikh ostrovakh. 1945–1947 gg.) [From War to Peace (Civil Administration in Southern Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands. 1945–1947)], IP Anistratov Aleksandr Sergeyevich, Korsakov, Russia.
  103. Shcheglov, V.V. (1999), Evolytutsiya gosudarstvennoy politiki formirovaniya naseleniya Sakhalinskoy oblasti (1925–1999) [Evolution of the State Policy of Forming the Population of the Sakhalin Region (1925–1999)], PhD thesis, Sakhalin State University, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russia.
  104. Shcheglov, V.V. (2000), “Pereseleniye sovetskikh grazhdan na Yuzhnyy Sakhalin i Kuril’skiye ostrova v seredine 40 – nachale 50-kh gg. XX v.” [Resettlement of Soviet Citizens to Southern Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands in the mid-40s – early 50s of the 20th Century], Kraevedcheskiy byulleten’, no. 4, pp. 54–68.
  105. Shcheglov, V.V. (2002), Naseleniye Sakhalinskoy oblasti XX v. [The Population of the Sakhalin Region in the 20th Century], Izd-vo YUSIEPI, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russia.
  106. Shcheglov, V.V. (2008), “Termin «territorial’naya absorbsiya» v yego prilozhenii k poslevoyennoy sakhalinskoy istorii” [The Term “Territorial Absorption” in its Application to Post-War Sakhalin History], Ne predat’ zabveniyu, Yuzhno- Sakhalinsk, Russia, 12 November 2008, pp. 114–120.
  107. Shcheglov, V.V. (2019), Opyt sakhalinskikh pereseleniy (1853–2002 gg.) [The Experience of Sakhalin Resettlements (1853–2002)], Sakhalinskaya oblastnaya tipografiya, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russia.
  108. Shubina, M.I. (1993), “Iz istorii formirovaniya slavyanskogo naseleniya Yuzhnogo Sakhalina v 1945–1960 gg.” [From the History of the Formation of the Slavic Population of Southern Sakhalin in 1945–1960], Slavyane na Dal’nem Vostoke: problemy istorii i kul’tury, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russia, 7–8 October 1993, pp. 124–128.
  109. Sidorov, S.G. (2012), “Repatriatsiya voyennoplennykh iz SSSR v 1947–1950 gg.” [Repatriation of Prisoners of War from the USSR in 1947–1950], Vlast’, no. 2, pp. 156–160.
  110. Spiridonov, M.N. (2001), Yaponskiye voyennoplennyye v Krasnoyarskom kraye (1945–1948): problemy razmeshcheniya, soderzhaniya i trudovogo ispol’zovaniya [Japanese Prisoners of War in the Krasnoyarsk Territory (1945–1948): Problems of Placement, Maintenance and Labor Use], PhD thesis, Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University, Krasnoyarsk, Russia.
  111. Taksami, Ch.M. and Kosarev, V.D. (1990), Kto vy, ayny? Ocherk istorii i kul’tury [Who Are You, Ainu? An Essay on History and Culture], Mysl’, Moscow, Russia.
  112. Turayev, V.A. (2018), “Etnicheskaya istoriya ainov Sakhalina i Kuril’skikh ostrovov v kontekste rossiysko-yaponskikh territorial’nykh razmezhevanii” [Ethnic History of the Ainu of Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands in the Context of Russian- Japanese Territorial Demarcations], Rossiya i ATR, no. 2, pp. 213–230.
  113. Vasilevskiy, A.A. (1993), “Osobennosti istoriko-kul’turnykh protsessov v zone perekhoda ot materikovoy k ostrovnoy sushe” [“Features of historical and cultural processes in the transition zone from the mainland to the island land”], Kraevedcheskiy byulleten’, no. 4, pp. 56-69.
  114. Vysokov, M.S. (1988), “Ot sostavitelya” [“From the compiler”], Etnograficheskie issledovaniya Sakhalinskogo oblastnogo kraevedcheskogo muzeya, no. 6, pp. 3-4.
  115. Vysokov, M.S. (1999), “Perspektivy resheniya problemy repatriatsii sakhalinskikh koreytsev v svete opyta Izrailya, Germanii i drugikh stran” [“Prospects for solving the problem of repatriation of Sakhalin Koreans in the light of the experience of Israel, Germany and other countries”], Kraevedcheskiy byulleten’, no. 2, pp. 94-102.
  116. Vysokov, M.S. (2006), “Prokofiev M.M. Katalog kollektsiy B.A. Zherebtsova po etnografii ainov Yuzhnogo Sakhalina iz seleniya Staroaynskoe (Raytisi) za 1948 g. v sobranii Sakhalinskogo oblastnogo kraevedcheskogo muzeya. Otvetstvennyy redaktor chlen-korrespondent RAN, d.i.n. S.A. Arutyunov. Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk: Sakhalinskiy oblastnoy kraevedcheskiy muzey. Institut naslediya Bronislava Pilsudskogo, 2005. 96 s., 84 ill. Tirazh 500 ekz.” [“Prokofiev M.M. Catalogue of the collections of B.A. Zherebtsov on the ethnography of the Ainu of Southern Sakhalin from the village of Staroaynskoe (Raytisi) for 1948 in the collection of the Sakhalin Regional Local Lore Museum. Responsible editor corresponding member of the RAS, Doctor of Historical Sciences S.A. Arutyunov. Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk: Sakhalin Regional Local Lore Museum. Bronislaw Pilsudski Heritage Institute, 2005. 96 p., 84 ill. Circulation 500 copies.”], Izvestiya Instituta naslediya Bronislava Pilsudskogo, no. 10, pp. 299-302.
  117. Vysokov, M.S. (2008), “Istoricheskiy opyt kolonizatsii Sakhalina Rossiey i sud’by korennogo naseleniya ostrova v XIX–XX vekakh” [“The historical experience of the colonization of Sakhalin by Russia and the fate of the indigenous population of the island in the 19th–20th centuries”], Uchenye zapiski Sakhu, no. 7, pp. 78-86.
  118. Vysokov, M.S. and Ishchenko, M.I., (1993), “Opyt osvoeniia chelovekom ostrovnykh territorii v severnoi chasti Tikhogo okeana: istoricheskii i etnologicheskii aspekty: (k postanovke problemy)” [“The experience of human development of island territories in the northern part of the Pacific Ocean: historical and ethnological aspects: (towards the problem statement)”], in Istoricheskii opyt osvoeniia vostochnykh raionov Rossii (v 3 vyp.). Vyp. 2, Vladivostok, Russia, 20–22 September 1993, pp. 16-18.
  119. Vysokov, M.S. and Ishchenko, M.I., (2009), “Rossiia i ostrovnoi mir Tikhogo okeana” [“Russia and the Island World of the Pacific Ocean”], Rossiia i ostrovnoi mir Tikhogo okeana, (1), pp. 7-10.
  120. Vysokov, M.S. and Lisitsyna, E.N., (2011), “Prinuditel’nyi trud v neftianoi promyshlennosti Sakhalina vo vtoroi polovine 40-kh – nachale 50-kh gg. XX v.” [“Forced Labor in the Sakhalin Oil Industry in the Second Half of the 1940s - Early 1950s”], Vestnik TOGU, 4(23), pp. 279-287.
  121. Vysokov, M.S. and Shubina, O.A., (1988), “Posledniaia ainka Iuzhnogo Sakhalina” [“The Last Ainu Woman of Southern Sakhalin”], Etnograficheskie issledovaniia Sakhalinskogo oblastnogo kraevedcheskogo muzeia, (6), pp. 82-88.
  122. Vysokov, M.S., Vasilevskii, A.A., Kostanov, A.I. and Ishchenko, M.I., (2008), Istoriia Sakhalina i Kuril’skikh ostrovov s drevneishikh vremen do nachala XXI stoletiia [History of Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands from Ancient Times to the Beginning of the 21st Century], Sakhalinskoe knizhnoe izdatel’stvo, Yuzhno- Sakhalinsk, Russia.
  123. Yaponskiye voyennoplennyye v Primor’ye (1945–1949 gg.): dokumenty Gosudarstvennogo arkhiva Primorskogo kraya (2005), (v 2 vyp.), vyp. 1: Trud voyennoplennykh v ugol’noy promyshlennosti [Japanese Prisoners of War in Primorye (1945–1949): Documents of the State Archive of the Primorsky Krai (in 2 issues), issue 1: The Labor of Prisoners of War in the Coal Industry], Tipografiya IPK MGU im. adm. G.I. Nevel’skogo, Vladivostok, Russia.
  124. Yaponskiye voyennoplennyye v Primor’ye (1945–1949 gg.): dokumenty Gosudarstvennogo arkhiva Primorskogo kraya (2006), (v 2 vyp.), vyp. 2: Trud voyennoplennykh v otraslyakh narodnogo khozyaystva Primorskogo kraya [Japanese Prisoners of War in Primorye (1945–1949): Documents of the State Archive of the Primorsky Krai (in 2 issues), issue 2: The Labor of Prisoners of War in the Branches of the National Economy of the Primorsky Krai], Tipografiya IPK MGU im. adm. G.I. Nevel’skogo, Vladivostok, Russia.
Din Y.I. The repatriation of civilians and POWs from Southern Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands after WWII: a study of Russian historiography
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22455/2949-5865-2025-3-368-405
Страницы: 368–405
16+
Any copyright infringement is prosecuted under the law of the Russian Federation (Civil Code of the Russian Federation – Chapter 70)
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
15 Chayanova St., office 209, Moscow, 125047.
+7 495 250 69 10
rggu@rggu.ru